is one of the smallest and most remote countries on earth. About
halfway between Hawaii and Australia, it is one of the nine tiny atolls
in the South Pacific that represent the Oceania island group. Theyre
studded with coconut palms and chalk white beaches. One imagines
Robinson Crusoe might have washed up on such a place. Yet tragedy is on
the horizon. With predicted sea level increases of up to 88cm in the
next century, the islanders are facing the imminent possibility that
Tuvalu may follow Atlantis to a watery grave.
In 1997, at the now-famous Kyoto conference convened to discuss climate change, Tuvalus Prime Minister Koloa Talake delivered an impassioned speech to the worlds leaders, imploring them to act immediately:
Talakes plea seemed to fall on deaf ears. Neither America or Australia
the two countries with the highest per-capita greenhouse gas
emissions ratified the Kyoto Protocol. Now, five years later and
already facing major floods, Tuvalu prepares itself for repatriation.
Starting this year, 75 Tuvalans will be relocated to New Zealand each
The prime minister, meanwhile, has hired law firms in both the US and Australia to help them build a court case against the worlds greenhouse polluters. He plans to take the case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague. Australian legal experts have warned their government to take the suit seriously, especially since it accepts the judgement of the International Court of Justice without reservation. Whatever the outcome, the court case will certainly attract worldwide media attention.
For now, life is relatively peaceful for Tuvalus 11,000 inhabitants. Subsistence agriculture and fishing still form the basis of the countrys economy, though in recent years the sale of territorial shipping rights to the international fisheries has pumped much needed money into the country. But the locals are very aware of what may be in store for them. As one of the most isolated nations on earth, the sea plays an integral role in their lives. They maintain a healthy respect for it. The fisherman have been among the first to notice the everyday effects of climate change. Many of the big islands that surround Tuvalu have shrunk to less than half their original size.
It will most probably not be complete inundation, however, that spells disaster for Tuvalu. Before the island is completely submerged, increasingly frequent storms will simply make life impossible on the island. Higher tides will increase the salinity of the soil to such an extent that the Tuvaluans traditional crops such as pulaka will be unable to survive.
Looming repatriation has cast a gloomy shadow over this tranquil place. Those who are not already planning migration cannot help but consider it as, one by one, their friends and neighbors desert the sinking ship. Yet despite New Zealands warm welcome, some islanders hold serious reservations about the quality of life in an industrialized country.
Equally serious questions are raised about Tuvalus economic future once people have left. Will they still retain the rights to the territorial waters? Can they ever be compensated for the loss of their entire culture beneath the waves and, if so, at whose feet can the bill be laid? Andrews Sims, a leading expert in the field of ecological debt suggests that such questions will become more and more pertinent as the long-term crises provoked by richer countries come to fruition. Ecological debt, where the rich take up more than their share of a finite environmental space, gives developing countries the moral high ground in international negotiations. There should be no question now of poor countries giving one cent of unpayable debt service to any rich country creditor before ecological debts are reconciled.
Australia responded recently to criticisms of its environmental stance with a report from its National Tidal Facility (NTF), which declared there to be no visible evidence of an acceleration in sea level trends. Instead, Bill Mitchell of the NTF suggested the islanders themselves were responsible for the flooding due to cutting down too many coconut palms, population density, and poor environmental management.
Tuvalu has responded with derision to Australias rebuff, pointing to statistics from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). An independent Greenpeace report also predicts a palpable
sea rise, concluding Tuvalu and Kiribati to be the most vulnerable countries.
Feelings between the two nations have worsened further still, in recent months, after Australias refusal to grant Tuvaluans any immigration rights. In conversation with the BBC, Paani Laupepa, Tuvalus Assistant Secretary of Natural Resources, Energy and Environment, said While New Zealand responded positively in the true Pacific way of helping ones neighbors, Australia on the other hand has slammed the door in our face.
Australia, perhaps wishing to hammer its stance home, has since asked Tuvalu to shelter Middle Eastern asylum seekers on their own turf. Since August 2001, Australia has turned away almost 2000 asylum seekers, referring them to the smaller Pacific nations to have their claims processed. Tuvalu Government spokesman Panapa Nelesone has said: We ask them for space and now theyre sending us their own people.
The forecast looks bad indeed for Tuvalu. Other island and coastal nations will be next. Though polluters are doing their best to look the other way, the evidence is already overpowering that catastrophic climate change is on its way. The 1990s was the hottest decade ever recorded, glaciers at both poles are in retreat, and Kilimanjaros snows are receding. Without caps on greenhouse emissions, the myth of Atlantis may soon become a reality.
Piers Moore Ede is a freelance writer in London.
Take Action: Earth Islands Climate Solutions project is working to make the Pacific Northwest a leader in solutions to climate change, as well as to inspire similar initiatives in other regions. Visit www.climatesolutions.org/, or write Climate Solutions, 610 4th Avenue E., Olympia, WA 98501
We don’t have a paywall because, as a nonprofit publication, our mission is to inform, educate and inspire action to protect our living world. Which is why we rely on readers like you for support. If you believe in the work we do, please consider making a tax-deductible year-end donation to our Green Journalism Fund.Donate
Get four issues of the magazine at the discounted rate of $20.