“Imagine that a scientist and a libertarian go out for a drive one day ” |
From the day Bush took office, its been his policy to disregard the advice and findings of environmental scientists, often espousing bad data put out by corporate sponsored Astroturf organizations in order to muddy scientific issues in the press.
![]() |
Photo: courtesy PZ Myers. |
But Bush couldnt do this without support from a hard core of free-market libertarians who resent any attempt by the government to regulate their ability to make profit. Its a peculiar pathology that thinks environmentalism is an evil plot, that planning is socialism, and that Jesus was a good capitalist. It is particularly irksome to deal with people who are so far gone that they deny science warning them of environmental dangers and impending problems.
How irksome? Imagine that a scientist and a libertarian go out for a drive one day
Libertarian: Isnt this wonderful? I have a desire to drive, and sufficient surplus
income to purchase a vehicle, and the market and technology provide me
with one.
Scientist: Uh, yeah, OK
but you know, the way youre
driving is neither safe nor economical. Could you maybe slow down a
little?
L: I can afford the gas, I have insurance, and my speedometer goes all the way up to 140. I havent exceeded the limit yet.
S: What you can do and what is safe and reasonable to do are two different
things. If you want to experience natural selection first-hand, thats
OK with me, except that were both in the same car.
By the way, thats a lake a couple of miles ahead, and youre headed straight for it.
L: Lake? We havent seen any lakes so far. We dont have to worry about
lakes. History is our guide, and it clearly says, no lakes.
S: Theres a lake right there in front of us. You can see it as well as I
can. Its marked right here on our map. I suggest you turn left just a
little bit and steer clear of it.
L: Oh, you doomsayers! We hit a mud puddle a few miles back, and see? No problems.
S: Im only predicting doom if you keep driving as foolishly as you have
so far. We should take an alternate route now, so that we dont have to
swerve too sharply at the last minute.
L: There is no lake. I like driving fast and straight. The last thing I want to do is turn left.
S: What do you mean, there is no lake? Its right there! And were getting closer by the minute!
L: We need more input. Lets ask my friend from the Alliance for a Common-Sense Automotive Trajectory.
(He reaches down beneath the seat. His hand re-emerges with a sock over it.)
SOCK [in a squeaky voice]: No lake!
L: Since Mr. Socky has taken economic considerations into account and you
have not, I can judge which is the better and more informed. Sound
science says there is no lake. Or if there is, we can accept the
compromise solution that it will disappear before we reach it.
S: Were headed for that lake at 80 miles per hour. Slow down and turn left!
L: I am confident that our economy will come up with a solution before we hit any hypothetical lake. Right, Mr Socky?
SOCK: salright!
S: I have been telling you what the solution is for the last three miles.
Slow down. Turn. Now! How is science going to save you if you insist on
ignoring it?
L: Aha! Look! Theres a pier
extending out into the lake! I told you that technology would be our
salvation. You scientists always underestimate the power of the free
market.
S: Thats a rickety 40-foot wooden dock. You cant drive at 90 miles per hour onto a short pier! BRAKE!
L: You are getting emotional. Market forces and the science and
engineering sector will respond to our needs by assembling a floating
bridge before we hit the end. Or perhaps they will redesign our car to
fly. Or dispatch a ferry or submarine to our location. We cannot
predict the specific solution, but we can trust that one will emerge.
Ive always wanted a flying car.
(The cars tires begin a rapid thumpety-thump as they go over the planks.)
L: I love you, Mr. Socky.
SOCK: Ditto!
PZ Myers is an associate professor of biology at the University of Minnesota, Morris. His Web site a wonderful source of writing on biology, the environment, and politics lives at www.pharyngula.org
We don’t have a paywall because, as a nonprofit publication, our mission is to inform, educate and inspire action to protect our living world. Which is why we rely on readers like you for support. If you believe in the work we do, please consider making a tax-deductible year-end donation to our Green Journalism Fund.
DonateGet four issues of the magazine at the discounted rate of $20.