Let’s have another cup of coffee
In the “Just Java” piece (Winter 2004), submitted by Co-op America, it
was announced that Procter & Gamble has now begun to offer a Fair
Trade coffee.
While some good behavior such as this has to be better than nothing, we
at Equal Exchange were not impressed by our much larger competitor’s
news. This is partly because size does matter. The size of one’s
efforts often reflects the seriousness of the commitment behind those
efforts.
In the case of P&G’s new Fair Trade product, we believe they can do
much more. They are selling only one Fair Trade coffee, available only
online, at over $14 pound. As the pioneer and leading seller of Fair
Trade, Equal Exchange believes that this approach is unlikely to help
farmers to the extent that we know to be possible. We know that
consumers like to have choices, that they prefer to buy their coffee in
stores, and that they will rarely pay $14 a pound. Our most popular
organic Fair Trade coffee usually sells for under $9 a pound.
The crisis facing small coffee farmers is so serious that we encourage
P&G to sell more Fair Trade coffee, despite the increased
competition with us. We challenge them to match our worker co-op pound
for pound in Fair Trade coffee sales in 2004.
Given P&G’s substantial power as the largest seller of coffee in
the US, we believe that they have the means to place their Fair Trade
coffee into supermarkets, and could do so at a competitive, yet
profitable, price. I think we all—farmers, consumers, and Fair Trade
supporters—would be happy to see that.
Rodney North, Equal Exchange Canton, MA
www.equalexchange.com
Behind the curve?
Your From the Editor (Winter 2004), while well intentioned, focused on news much older than you acknowledge and displayed an unfortunate myopia.
The piece described how “a rather remarkable story broke” concerning
the treasonous White House leak to journalists asserting that Joseph
Wilson’s wife Valerie Plame was a CIA agent. Although the piece is
undated, “just two days before” press time for the Winter issue came
months after the scandal was reported last July by David Corn in The Nation, and widely disseminated by Buzzflash.com and many other alternative news outlets, outlets similar to Earth Island Journal in political and environmental viewpoint.
Why does the editor of one of the world’s most important environmental magazines—EIJ—choose
to waste a column on belated mainstream news accounts? The dutiful
mainstream media are largely responsible for the disastrous blank
checks given to Bush in nearly every arena of government—including the
environmentally catastrophic war in Iraq—and for regurgitating the PR
spin put on issues like the Orwellian “Healthy Forest Initiative” and
“Clear Skies” legislation. Surely Chris Clarke realizes this.
Bush and Co. are directly responsible for many of the rapidly
escalating environmental catastrophes we are now witnessing in the US
and elsewhere, and EIJ should not be reluctant to “mention the US
president,” especially when elections are looming.
Gabe Kirchheimer
New York, NY
Chris Clarke responds: Good points all, and of course I had
seen David Corn’s work. What happened just before our print date is
that the story finally gained a foothold in the public consciousness
outside the anti-war left. (With remarkable speed, compared to some
such stories: the media still report the “attack” on US ships in the
Gulf of Tonkin as fact.)
I have no problem with preaching to the choir. I’d just like to make
that choir bigger. And in order to do so, we’re going to have to spend
time advancing arguments that may occasionally seem a little pedestrian
to people who’ve been down that path already.
Shock and ugh
I just opened this month’s issue and am absolutely disgusted by the
Tofurky ad on the inside of the cover. To use the phrase “shock and
awe” to sell a “turkey alternative”—or anything for that matter—is
not only in bad taste, it is horrifying. I am sure you realize that
this is an allusion to the US government’s catch phrase for their
bombing of Baghdad at the beginning of the war—a war that has killed
thousands upon thousands of innocent people for the greed of the US
government and its corporate friends.
I will contact the Tofurky company myself, but also hope that you will
never allow such an ad again. We can’t create a just, peaceful,
ecologically sane world by selling meat alternatives using war slogans.
Jen Barkan
Oakland, CA
The Earth Island Journal welcomes your letters. Send to
Letters to the Editor, Earth Island Journal, 300 Broadway, Suite #28,
San Francisco CA, 94133, USA, or e-mail them to cclarke@earthisland.org. Letters will be edited for length, grammar and clarity.
We don’t have a paywall because, as a nonprofit publication, our mission is to inform, educate and inspire action to protect our living world. Which is why we rely on readers like you for support. If you believe in the work we do, please consider making a tax-deductible year-end donation to our Green Journalism Fund.
DonateGet four issues of the magazine at the discounted rate of $20.