The Nephin Beg mountain range rises on Ireland’s western coast and stretches 20 miles into the sparsely populated northwest of County Mayo. This is a landscape of boglands and heath-covered mountains, battered by Atlantic winds and rain. The only forests here are stands of Lodgepole pine and Sitka spruce, planted in an attempt to wrestle economic gain from the unproductive soil.
Photo by Anthony Hickey
On a long coastline of wet, weather-beaten hills, the Nephin Begs aren’t unique. But they form one of the few big areas of roadless, uninhabited terrain in Ireland.
Now this range is home to a pioneering re-wilding project. In March, Ireland’s National Parks and Wildlife Service, and Coillte, a public forestry company — the region’s two big landholders — designated 27,000 acres of bog, mountain, and forest out here as Ireland’s first wilderness area, Wild Nephin.
The project has three core aims: to protect a large wild landscape, re-wild the forest, and provide a “primitive” wilderness experience for visitors.
Over the next 15 years the project will aim to “naturalize” the plantations. It will thin the forest cover to let more light into the understory, create more clearings, restore areas of bogland, and plant some native species. Trees will be felled but left in place to mimic natural catastrophes and encourage regeneration. Forest roads will be closed and converted to trails.
While many conservation areas in Ireland are utilized in some way — often for sheep and cattle grazing — Wild Nephin will seek to create a wild, “self-willed” landscape. “What we want to do over the next 15 years is re-engineer the forest, so in 15 years time when we step out of the management of the area, then only wild processes will change the landscape,” says Wild Nephin project manager Bill Murphy.
The region is not yet a perfect wilderness. In 2002, Ireland was prosecuted by the European Commission for allowing part of the region to be overgrazed by sheep (stocks have since been reduced). The Nephin forests also bear the scars of past logging. The re-wilding project will not seek to remove the non-native conifers that dominate the forests; instead it will encourage natural regeneration.
The Wild Nephin project is part of a loose but growing movement to create and protect wilderness across Europe, and to re-wild ecologically degraded landscapes. Germany, for instance, is aiming to designate 2 percent of its land area as wilderness by 2020.
The nonprofit Rewilding Europe aims to rewild one million hectares of land by 2020 and create 10 “magnificent” wildlife and wilderness areas. The group hopes its efforts “will serve as inspirational examples of what can also be achieved elsewhere.” Another organization, Pan Parks, also plans to safeguard one million hectares of European wilderness by 2015. Pan Parks oversees a network of wilderness areas, including mountainous regions in Eastern Europe, an island archipelago in Finland, and forests and boglands in Estonia and Lithuania. All these areas are within existing national parks, but must now satisfy the Pan Parks’ definition of wilderness, which prohibits logging, hunting, fishing, agriculture, roads or construction in designated areas.
Earlier this month, the World Wilderness Congress was held in Salamanca, Spain — the first time in 20 years Europe hosted the event. Wilderness groups published a document, A Vision for A Wilder Europe, calling for the continent’s last wilderness areas to be protected, and for natural processes to be allowed shape more of Europe’s land.
“If we can get people behind our cause, then we can say that no more wilderness is going to be lost in Europe,” says the Pan Parks’ executive director Zoltan Kun.
The term re-wilding is often used to describe the re-introduction of big, locally extinct species — like the gray wolf in the United States’ Yellowstone National Park. But in reality it often means less eye-catching projects like Wild Nephin, which aim to restore landscapes and allow wild processes to take over. And indeed, iconic species of bear, lynx and wolf are all making a comeback across Europe.
“Wilderness probably wasn’t even on the European radar in philosophical terms if you go back 20 years,” says Toby Aykroyd of the Wild Europe Initiative, an alliance of conservation and wilderness groups. But that has changed. Momentum for rewilding stems from a 2009 motion passed by the European Parliament that called for more wilderness protection, and for wilderness to be defined and mapped. Last year the European Commission published a biodiversity strategy that mentioned wilderness for the first time.
However, most of the wilderness that remains in Europe is in the east of the continent. In densely populated, urbanized Western Europe, little land is truly wild. In Ireland even the most remote mountain valleys provide grazing for sheep, while in the UK national parks protect cultural landscapes as much as wild ones, with villages and farms inside their boundaries.
“Wilderness is not a word you’ll find in all European languages, so it’s very difficult for there to be a common literature or history [of wilderness preservation],” says Mark Fisher of the Wildland Research Institute at Leeds University, UK.
In this, Europe differs from the United States, where the writing of early wilderness advocates —from John Muir to Aldo Leopold and Edward Abbey —seems to have taken root in the national psyche.
“If you look at the history of protected areas in America… there was a movement to protect areas of huge scenic quality,” Fisher says. In Europe, however, early conservation movements were science-driven, he says. They aimed to protect landscapes where important species and biological communities thrived. And because of that, an emotional response to wild places never became embedded in European culture, Fisher says.
The idea of rewilding areas in a continent where the human imprint is so large, has set off a debate over best conservation practices. Earlier this year, the British writer and environmentalist George Monbiot provoked heated discussion with his latest book Feral: Searching for Enchantment on the Frontiers of Rewilding, and a series of articles that took a pointed look at the aims of conservationists. Monbiot criticized UK conservationists for their “intensive management of the natural world”.
“Nowhere else does conservation look more like a slightly modified version of the farming which trashed the land in the first place,” he wrote in a column on the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds website. Monbiot believes rewilding should involve reintroducing missing animals and plants that were once native to a region, and abandoning “the biblical doctrine of dominion” that assumes it is our duty to “control and corral” nature. “In my view most of our conservation areas aren’t nature reserves at all. They are museums of former farming practices, weeded and tended to prevent the wilds from encroaching,” he writes.
Even groups that aren’t pushing as hard for species reintroduction agree that conservation efforts in Europe have been too focused on preserving individual species and habitats rather than whole dynamic ecosystems. “I think traditional conservation has got stuck in a rut around a kind of gardening ethos,” says Toby Aykroyd of the Wild Europe Initiative.
But campaigners seem to be chipping away at this thinking. The Wild Europe Initiative includes big conservation groups such as Birdlife International, UNESCO, and the WWF. The European Commission recently commissioned the production of guidelines for “non intervention” management of wild areas, and an official register of wilderness in Europe is in production.
The Wild Nephin project was recently the centerpiece of a major conference, held in Irish town of Westport, on wilderness in modified landscapes. Inherent in this theme was the acceptance that, in Western Europe, wilderness will have to be created by rewilding habitats that have been modified by humans.
“The whole idea of wilderness in Europe is going to be different from the idea of wilderness in North America,” says Wild Nephin’s Bill Murphy says. “We have to come up with a context that suits our culture.”
Zultan Kun of Pan Parks believes that ultimately, there’s a moral obligation —both to the developing world and to future generations — to protect wild land in Europe. “We always talk about protecting the Amazon rainforest, or protecting Borneo. And while we argue for that we destroy our nature here,” he says. Kun stresses the difference between rewilding and restoring wilderness — you could rewild your city garden, but you won’t get a wilderness.
These are still early days for the wilderness movement in Europe. While Pan Parks might be one of Europe’s biggest wildland advocacy groups, Kun told me the group employs just four people who all work from home. He was working from his daughter’s bedroom when we spoke.
Kun dreams of turning 5 percent of Europe into protected wilderness. Right now an estimated 1 percent of European land is wilderness, and another 1 percent is near-wilderness that requires restoration.
But environmentalists see the potential to drastically increase this, partly due to high levels of land abandonment across Europe. And Kun believes that as economic recession dries up funding for conservation in Europe, the political environment could favor a more hands-off approach to managing protected areas.
“We have the favorable political environment to take wilderness further, but we need to create massive public support for it,” he says.
We don’t have a paywall because, as a nonprofit publication, our mission is to inform, educate and inspire action to protect our living world. Which is why we rely on readers like you for support. If you believe in the work we do, please consider making a tax-deductible year-end donation to our Green Journalism Fund.Donate