Four-Day-Old Baby Orangutan Needlessly Killed at the Basel Zoo

Zoos kill otherwise healthy animals for a wide variety of self-serving reasons and call it 'management euthanasia.'

This is just a short piece to alert people to what happened at the Basel Zoo in Switzerland this week. Many people don’t know what happened and many have asked me to write something so that a wider audience would know. More information can be found here — Zoo Basel puts baby orangutan to sleep – now a shitstorm is raging — and in articles below. A baby Orangutan was killed—not euthanized—at the Basel Zoo after her mother, Revital, died.

A mama and baby at Sepilok Orangutan Rehabilitation Centre in Sabah, Malaysia, Borneo. “The broad statement that hand-raised orangutans cannot live in social pairs or groups… and that they do not breed is untrue,” says Patti Ragan, founder of Center for Great Apes sanctuary. Photo by Chris Charles/Unsplash.

This is a case of “zoothanasia” as I call it, because killing the baby was not done as a mercy killing because she was suffering from interminable pain or from an incurable disease —she wasn’t. The zoo decided the baby wouldn’t live or have a quality life because she was motherless. This claim is unfounded. (see Note 1) Shame on them.

Killing the baby is ethically indefensible no matter what zoo administrators say. This is not a “radical animal rights” position but rather all about decency and respect for the life of every single individual—the baby should not have been killed. And, of course, the mother should never have been impregnated.

Zoos kill otherwise healthy animals for a wide variety of self-serving reasons. Many people don’t know this. Zoos call it “management euthanasia” to sanitize this heinous act. The individuals are written off as “surplus animals” and slaughtered.

In a BBC News essay by Hannah Barnes called “How many healthy animals do zoos put down?” we learn: “EAZA [European Association of Zoos and Aquaria] does not publish these records or advertise the number of healthy animals that have been culled, but executive director Dr Lesley Dickie estimates that somewhere between 3,000 and 5,000 animals are ‘management euthanised’ in European zoos in any given year.”

Three thousand to five thousand animals isn’t a small number at all. Indeed, I was shocked when I learned this fact and that this large number of animals was considered to be disposable at the whim of zoo administrators who then come up with lame excuses for why they killed the animals.

In January 2018 we learned that a zoo in Sweden had killed — they used the word “euthanized”— nine healthy lion cubs since 2012 because they couldn’t afford to keep them. People who didn’t know that zoos do these sorts of sickening things are incensed as they should be. After Marius the young giraffe was slaughtered in the Copenhagen Zoo in 2014, I had contact with people from all over the world about how surprised and upset they were, including many who never before had gotten involved with animal protection.

Animals who understandably escape from their cages and horrific lives at zoos also are routinely killed. In December 2022, three chimpanzees were shot dead soon after they escaped from their cages in the Furuviksparken zoo in Sweden, and a fourth was also killed shortly thereafter. The zoo was closed and the chimpanzees were killed because the zoo didn’t have enough anesthetic on hand. They also said that the chimpanzees were killed because of concerns for human safety.

When pressed on the issue of killing healthy animals, zoo directors will often claim that it is “necessary” or “it had to be done” or will use some dismissive strategy such as, “It’s a complicated issue.” In an interview I did with Jenny Gray, CEO of Zoos Victoria (Australia), when I asked her about killing so-called surplus animals—I wondered if she would have chosen to kill Marius or other animals who couldn’t contribute for one reason or another to your zoo’s breeding programshe said, “I have deliberately not given simple answers to what are complex issues. Many arguments can be mounted. I would hope that students of ethics can refine not only their personal view but also the plausible arguments to the contrary.” Of course, there are many arguments to the contrary that rely on doing what’s right and what’s decent.

Deciding to kill otherwise healthy individuals really is not complicated at all. Zoos should not kill healthy animals, and if zoo management practices “require” the killing of healthy animals, then these practices need to change. Right now, today.

Also, of course, captive breeding needs to be stopped. The animals who are born in zoos are unlikely ever to be “reintroduced” to their native habitats and might just be killed because zoos find them useless. As outrageous as this sounds, it is a reality that never, ever, should happen.

Note 1: In response to the zoo’s claim that they killed the baby out of concerns for her well-being, Patti Ragan, Founder, Center for Great Apes, told me:

“Hand-raising newborn orangutans does not make it impossible to introduce them to other orangutan companions or mates when appropriate. The orangutans at the sanctuary live in social pairs or small groups and were introduced together after years living with humans. The broad statement that hand-raised orangutans cannot live in social pairs or groups… and that they do not breed is untrue. When so many people and organizations in Borneo and Sumatra, as well as zoos and sanctuaries around the world, are struggling to save the lives of every individual orangutan, this situation where a critically endangered species was euthanized as a newborn is heartbreaking and sickening. The deed is done. But hopefully more awareness of options and possibilities will affect the outcome for another infant in the future who is in a crisis situation.” (included with her permission)

Some relevant links:

Jane Goodall Institute, Statement on the killing of chimpanzees in Swedish EAZA Zoo Furuviksparken

“Zoothanasia” Is Not Euthanasia: Words Matter

Killing Healthy Animals in Zoos: “Zoothanasia” is a Reality

Healthy Young Zoo Giraffe to be Killed: “Zoothanasia” Redux

Swiss Zoo Kills Healthy Young Bear to Protect Him

Zoo Ethics and the Challenges of Compassionate Conservation

Swedish Zoo “Zoothanizes” Nine Healthy, “Useless” Lion

Sweden Furuvik zoo: Anger over shooting of chimpanzees in zoo escape

Three chimpanzees shot dead after escape from Swedish zoo

Surreal’ killing of 4 chimpanzees has zoologist reconsidering ties with Swedish zoo

How many healthy animals do zoos put down?

Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

You Make Our Work Possible

You Make Our Work Possible

We don’t have a paywall because, as a nonprofit publication, our mission is to inform, educate and inspire action to protect our living world. Which is why we rely on readers like you for support. If you believe in the work we do, please consider making a tax-deductible year-end donation to our Green Journalism Fund.

Donate
Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

The Latest

Whale Snot, Delivered by Drone

Researchers are using aerial vehicles to study infectious disease in Arctic cetaceans.

Brynn Pedrick

Birding in Gaza

Celebrating links across species amid a nightmare of war.

Rebecca Gordon

Nepal’s Embattled ‘Mad Honey’ Bee

In the Himalayas, development, climate change, and the global market for an intoxicating honey are pushing one bee species to the brink.

Manish Koirala

In Coastal British Columbia,
the Haida Get Their Land Back

By affirming Indigenous land ownership, British Columbia and the Haida Nation are signaling a new era for Indigenous relations.

Serena Renner

Can We Ever Escape the Evils of Capitalism?

In Review: Ryûsuke Hamaguchi’s newest film explores the nature of gentrification and rural refuge.

Ed Rampell

To Protect a Forest, He Organized its People

Alok Shukla pulled together a community resistance campaign that saved an ancient forest in India from being dug up for coal.

Maureen Nandini Mitra