Facebook Suspends Environmental Groups Despite Vow to Fight Climate Misinformation

Social media giant blames mistake in system for restrictions on groups including Greenpeace USA, Rainforest Action Network.

Facebook has suspended the accounts of several environmental organizations less than a week after launching an initiative it said would counter a tide of misinformation over climate science on the platform.

photo of climate march
Activists say hundreds of individual accounts linked to Indigenous, climate, and social groups were suspended over the weekend in addition to those of large environmental groups. Photo by of Dan Alcalde.

Groups such as Greenpeace USA, Climate Hawks Vote, and Rainforest Action Network were among those blocked from posting or sending messages on Facebook over the weekend. Activists say hundreds of other individual accounts linked to Indigenous, climate, and social justice groups were also suspended for an alleged “intellectual property rights violation.”

The suspended people and groups were all involved in a Facebook event from May last year that targeted KKR & Co, a US investment firm that is backing the Coastal GasLink pipeline, a 670km-long gas development being built in northern British Columbia, Canada.

The suspensions, the day before another online action aimed at KKR & Co, has enraged activists who oppose the pipeline for its climate impact and for cutting through the land of the Wetʼsuwetʼen, a First Nations people.

“Videos of extreme violence, alt-right views, and calls for violence by militias in Kenosha, Wisconsin, are allowed to persist on Facebook,” said Delee Nikal, a Wet’suwet’en community member. “Yet we are banned and receive threats for permanent removal, for posting an online petition.”

Many of the accounts have now been restored, but a handful are still blocked, with no fuller explanation coming from Facebook.

In a statement, a Facebook spokesperson said: “Our systems mistakenly removed these accounts and content. They have since been restored and we’ve lifted any limits imposed on identified profiles.”

The suspensions came just a few days after the social media giant said it was launching a “climate science information center” to counter widely shared but misleading posts that reject the established science of the climate crisis.

“We’re committed to tackling climate misinformation,” Facebook said in a statement that also outlined its own efforts to reduce its own net greenhouse gas emissions to zero this year. The information center will include posts from trusted scientific sources, rated by fact-checkers.

“As with all types of claims debunked by our fact-checkers, we reduce the distribution of these posts in News Feed and apply a warning label on top of these posts both on Facebook and Instagram so people understand that the content has been rated false,” the company said.

But climate organizations have questioned whether Facebook is doing enough to cut down on untruths about the climate crisis that are spread across the site. In 2018, for example, a video that denied that human activity was driving the climate crisis was shared on Facebook and viewed 5 million times.

Articles and videos about climate change can be deemed opinion, meaning under Facebook guidelines they can’t be blocked by its factcheckers. This loophole meant that that this month the CO2 Coalition, a group that argues more carbon dioxide is good for the planet, managed to overturn a factcheck on an article that attacked the accuracy of climate models. A factcheck rated the piece as “false” but it was published by Facebook when labelled as opinion.

“Actions speak louder than words and once again Facebook has taken actions that are in stark contrast to public statements from the company,” said Elizabeth Jardim, senior corporate campaigner at Greenpeace USA.

“The recent bans targeting people fighting to save their communities from climate change and the continued exploitation of fossil fuel companies show us that when push comes to shove, Facebook will side with polluters at the cost of their users’ trying to organize.”

Facebook was contacted for comment.

Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

The Latest

A Bug’s Life

I photograph insects because they are at risk, and visual recording of our natural world is a key conservation tool.

Amit Roy

Banks Lent $2.6tn Linked to Ecosystem and Wildlife Destruction in 2019

Lack of policies regulating impact on natural world means finance industry effectively bankrolling biodiversity loss, analysis finds

Patrick Greenfield and Phoebe Weston The Guardian

The Midas Touch?

A Canadian company wants to build a massive gold mine in Idaho’s Valley County. Under a pending agreement with the Trump administration, it could be let off the hook for the resulting waste.

Raquel Dominguez and Aaron Mintzes

Picking up the Pieces After a Disaster

Climate chaos is the through line in Rebuilding Paradise, but the documentary also offers tales of resilience and community.

Ed Rampell

Fossil fuel Phaseout, Fenceline Communities, Environmental Justice Take a Seat at the Table

Last night's presidential debate underscored the environmental movement's success in pushing the needle forward on the political discourse on climate change.

Maureen Nandini Mitra

‘We Don’t Have Any Choice’: The Young Climate Activists Naming and Shaming US Politicians

As the election nears, young Americans are calling on US politicians to take action on climate, police brutality and immigration

Nina Lakhani The Guardian