EPA Blocks Permit for Largest Proposed MTR Mine in History

Arch Coal has been looking to expand its environmentally destructive operations at its Spruce 1 mine in West Virginia since the late-1990s, and on January 13 the second-largest coal supplier in the United States hit a roadblock.

After enduring a decade of opposition from environmental groups, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) flexed its muscle. With the Clean Water Act as its authority, the EPA vetoed the proposed expansion permit for Spruce 1, which Army Corps of Engineers had already signed off on. The EPA has used the Clean Water Act in a similar fashion only 12 times since its inception in 1972.

"The history of EPA’s use of our ... authority demonstrates clearly that permits are not vulnerable to being revoked,” an EPA spokeswoman stated after intense criticism from the coal industry. “The [Army] Corps authorizes approximately 100,000 projects in the nation’s waters every year, which translates to millions of permits during the past 39 years” of the Clean Water Act.

Environmentalists were jubilant. As initially proposed, Spruce 1 was to be the largest mountaintop removal mine in history. It was to span three thousands acres and would have filled five valleys and destroyed six miles of streams with its noxious mining debris.

“The EPA has resisted enormous pressure from Arch Coal and the coal lobby in carrying out its responsibility to put the protection of our environment and the communities who depend upon it, ahead of corporate profits,” responded Amanda Starbuck of the Rainforest Action Network (RAN) after the EPA’s announcement.

Last September RAN activists dumped 1,000 pounds of Appalachia dirt on the sidewalk of EPA headquarters in Washington DC to protest Spruce 1.

While hailed as a victory by adversaries of mountaintop removal, Arch Coal predictably disagreed with the EPA’s bold decision.

“We believe this decision will have a chilling effect on future U.S. investment because every business possessing or requiring a permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act will fear similar overreaching by the EPA,” Arch Coal spokeswoman Kim Link said in a statement. “It’s a risk many businesses cannot afford to take.”

The Clean Water Act’s Section 404(c) gives the EPA authority to block permits for mining operations that dump debris in water bodies if such activities have “unacceptable adverse effects” on water quality.

The coal industry and its political allies in Washington are already calling on the courts to overturn the EPA’s assessment. West Virginia Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin unashamedly stated the his state “will continue with all efforts to get this decision reversed."

“I am deeply angered by the EPA’s decision to revoke the Spruce Mine permit,” added Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a long-time ally of coal. “Their decision is wrong and unfair – Spruce Mine has always made good faith efforts to comply with the applicable laws and regulations. But this fight is not over. Ultimately, this is a decision that has a strong chance of being overturned by the courts, and I will continue to do everything in my power to stand up for our West Virginia miners and their jobs.”

The future of Spruce 1 is far from written. Arch Coal has already appealed the EPA’s review of the permit while environmentalists will persist in contesting an operation the agency approved for another section of the Spruce 1 site that will result in burying almost a mile of streambed.

You Make Our Work Possible

You Make Our Work Possible

We are standing at a pivotal moment in history, one in which education and advocacy around the climate emergency, public health, racial injustice, and economic inequity is imperative. At Earth Island Journal, we have doubled down on our commitment to uplifting stories that often go unheard, to centering the voices of frontline communities, and to always speak truth to power. We are nonprofit publication. We don’t have a paywall because our mission is to inform, educate and inspire action. Which is why we rely on readers like you for support. If you believe in the work we do, please consider making a tax-deductible year-end donation to our Green Journalism Fund.

Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

The Latest

US Vows to Cut Emissions at Least 50 Percent by 2030 Ahead of Climate Summit

Move comes as the US scrambles to regain international credibility after the climate denialist presidency of Donald Trump.

Oliver Milman The Guardian

Turning the Tide on Large-Scale Hydropower

In Colombia, activists and scientists are boosting mega-dam resistance by showing the cumulative impacts of these destructive projects.

Daniel Henryk Rasolt

Interstate Water Wars are Heating Up Along with the Climate

States should put at least as much effort into reducing water use as they do into litigation, because there are no guaranteed winners in water lawsuits.

Robert Glennon

Sailing the Seas on Reused Plastic

A Swahili dhow known as the FlipFlopi shows that environmental innovation can coexist with tradition.

Tasha Goldberg

A Plea to Recognize the Legal Rights of the Maas River

I am advocating for a new legal status for the Maas in the hope that it becomes the first river in Europe with rights.

Jessica den Outer

Nearly 60 Million Americans Don’t Drink Their Tap Water, Research Suggests

Distrust and disuse of tap water is a public health problem.

Asher Rosinger