British Columbia Government Using ‘Judas’ Wolf in Unethical Hunt, Say Wildlife Advocates

Collared wolf may be kept alive to help government track and kill pack members time and time again

The mass killing of gray wolves in British Columbia (BC) has ignited a bitter feud between Canadian government officials and conservationists. The government has insisted that the cull, which began in early 2015, is the only way to save the critically endangered mountain caribou, while wildlife advocates argue that wolves are merely being scapegoated for habitat loss in the region. In recent weeks, the battle has heated up with the release of audio clips of a recorded interview with a retired wildlife patrol guide who outlines the controversial methods used in the culls.

Photo of Grey Wolf British ColumbiaPhoto courtesy of Wildlife Defence League The Wildlife Defence League believes the wolf in this photo, captured by a trail camera, may be the Judas wolf or one of the wolves later killed in the region.

In the interview, released by the nonprofit Wildlife Defence League, the man — who remains anonymous but claims to work for the BC government’s caribou recovery program — explains that a wolf is caught in foot traps, tranquilized, and fitted with a radio collar. When the collared wolf rejoins his pack, the entire pack can then be tracked and killed by gunmen in helicopters. Above the sound of rattling machinery, the source also reveals that the collared wolf is kept alive to track and kill any new pack members: “They leave that one with the radio collar to live, and now they can come back, and okay he’s got buddies, better take them out.” Although the source didn’t specify whether the wolf would be kept alive for next season’s cull, members of the Wildlife Defence League believe that he will be.

Although conservationists have long suspected that a lone wolf (often called a “Judas” wolf) is used to track and kill an entire pack, members of the Wildlife Defence League were astonished to learn that the wolf was kept alive after the initial cull. “It’s shocking and heartbreaking, not to mention inhumane,” says Tommy Knowles, founder of the Wildlife Defence League. “Can you imagine how you’d feel if you saw your whole family killed in front of you?”

Marc Bekoff, author of Rewilding Our Hearts: Building Pathways of Compassion and Coexistence, echoes Knowles sentiment, and suggests that the emotional pain the Judas wolf would go through would be unimaginable. “Wolves are highly social, emotional, and sentient animals, and the use of a Judas wolf is reprehensible, morally indefensible, and should be absolutely forbidden, illegal and severely punished,” he says. “There’s no doubt that the individual who is chosen to ‘betray’ her or his family, friends, and others, deeply suffers as do the other wolves who are lured in.”

In February, Wildlife Defence League released the audio recordings to the public, asking the BC government to respond to the allegations that a Judas wolf was kept alive. A spokesperson from the Forests, Lands, and Natural Resources told National Observer that “there was not a lone wolf being kept alive last year as a ‘Judas’ wolf,” but the government hasn’t confirmed or denied whether a wolf was kept alive this year. “We haven’t received a direct response from the government,” says Knowles. “I think they’re deliberately avoiding the question.”

Coupled with the cruelty of keeping the Judas wolf alive, Knowles believes shooting wolves by helicopter is not as “humane” as the government claims it to be. “The BC government says it can kill wolves with one gun shot from a helicopter, but if you look at wolf hunting videos from the 1960s an 1970s, you’ll see that’s not really possible,” Knowles says. “What’s more likely is that wolves are being shot in the hind leg or hip, then darting into the woods to die a slow, agonizing death.”

The BC government has allocated $2.2 million in taxpayer funds to pay for the five-year wolf cull program, which began in January of 2015, hiring local BC company Bighorn Helicopters to gun down wolves in the South Selkirk and South Peace regions of the province. Bighorn is the same helicopter company that killed over 1,000 wolves in Alberta between 2005 and 2015 in what was later shown to be an ineffective strategy to stabilize caribou numbers. In February 2016, the Wildlife Defence League launched a pressure campaign on Facebook to try and get Bighorn to end their participation in the cull. “We’re encouraging the public to call in and email them, just to let them know how they feel about their tax dollars being spent on the wolf cull,” says Knowles.

Conservationists ultimately hope that the BC government will stop the cull, and refocus its efforts on protecting the region’s remaining old-growth forests, habitat for the endangered caribou. These forests are being destroyed at an alarming rate from logging, mining, oil and gas exploration, and recreational activities, which wildlife advocates see as the root cause of caribou population decline.

Admittedly, there is a slim chance the mountain caribou herds will successfully recover to pre-industrial numbers. As Krista Roessingh of the nonprofit Pacific Wild explains, habitat fragmentation and destruction is just part of the problem. In some regions of British Columbia, such as the South Selkirk, a herd of just 12 to 18 caribou remain, which is too small to be a self-sustaining number. “When caribou numbers go down, it means they’re susceptible to all kinds of problems. If you have a population of 18 caribou, for instance, there’s a good chance that wildfire or disease or bad winter could wipe that whole population out.”

Even if it is too late for the mountain caribou, Roessingh believes that wolves shouldn’t be scapegoated for the mistakes of humans, and that the BC government should examine the ethical consequence of killing wolves. “I don’t think it’s a question of saving the wolf,” Roessingh says, “it’s a question of keeping them from being senselessly killed in an inhumane way to make up for years and years of government inaction on caribou habitat protection.”

You Make Our Work Possible

You Make Our Work Possible

We are standing at a pivotal moment in history, one in which education and advocacy around the climate emergency, public health, racial injustice, and economic inequity is imperative. At Earth Island Journal, we have doubled down on our commitment to uplifting stories that often go unheard, to centering the voices of frontline communities, and to always speak truth to power. We are nonprofit publication. We don’t have a paywall because our mission is to inform, educate and inspire action. Which is why we rely on readers like you for support. If you believe in the work we do, please consider making a tax-deductible year-end donation to our Green Journalism Fund.

Donate
Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our monthly newsletter.

The Latest

Supreme Court Rules against EPA, Hobbles Government Power to Limit Emissions

Court sides with Republican states as ruling represents landmark moment in rightwing effort to dismantle ‘regulatory state.’

Oliver Milman The Guardian

Feeding Insects to Cattle Could Make Meat and Milk Production More Sustainable

Adding black soldier fly larvae to cattle feed can reduce the amount of methane cows produce, research shows.

Merritt Drewery

Avocado Farms Dry Up Water Resources in Mexico

Rich tradition of cultivating and collecting medicinal plants in Michoacán state is at risk as Indigenous community loses access to water.

Monica Pelliccia

Satellites Zoom in on Cities’ Hottest Neighborhoods

Local governments can use data to help combat the urban heat island effect.

Daniel P. Johnson

Maasai Leaders ​Arrested in Protests over​ ​Tanzanian Game Reserve

Dozens wounded in clashes with police over eviction from ancestral lands to make way for hunting and safaris.

Katie McQue and Mattha Busby The Guardian

Proposed Deal Could Slash Toxic Emissions in America’s ‘Cancer Alley’

Consent decree on two suits against the EPA by residents of one of most polluted parts of Louisiana would lead to a review of federal air pollutant standards.

Oliver Laughland The Guardian