From a Press Release, CDRPC, Lyon, January 26, 2006
The
Report of the Investigative Commission on the Consequences of Nuclear
Testing Makes France Face Its Responsibilties
The Investigative Commission on the
Consequences of Aerial Nuclear Testing in French Polynesia between
1996 and 1974, established July 2005 by the French Polynesian
Assembly, filed its report January 24, 2006, ten years after the last
test, which was carried out in Fangataufa
January 27, 1996. (Below are
the recommendations from the report.)
In their report, the elected members of the
Assembly show proof that the 46 aerial tests which took place from
1966 to 1974 did, at each test, cause radioactive fallout over all
of the inhabited archipelagos of Polynesia, contrary to what has
always been affirmed by the French military authorities.
The Minister of defense, who today claims voluntary and total
transparency, has refused any contact and thus any cooperation with
the Inquiry Commission. In
order to respond to the official silence, the Inquiry Commission has
decided to contribute alone to the transparency.
Due to independent contributions, the Commission is
publishing 25 secret military documents from 1966 to 1967 in their
entirety. These
documents show evidence that not only did the military authorities
lie about the reality of the radioactive fallout, but they, under
orders, contributed to the silence concerning the dangers to which
the inhabitants of the island near to Moruroa
were exposed.
Today the members of the Polynesian Assembly
consider that their people were simply abandoned to radioactive
fallout even though the military affirmed that they were in control
of the situation. The
important health problems—thyroid cancer, leukemia, and other
cancers—from which the Polynesian people suffer today must be
carefully examined in regard to the considerable risks to which they
were exposed.
The Inquiry Commission, which has interviewed
more than 35 people; politicians, medical personnel and other
professional people, and which has consulted numerous medical
records and received numerous letters, believes that certain
promises for development made to the Polynesian government in
exchange for nuclear testing have not been honored.
Today, sustainable development in
Polynesia
is essentially non-existent.
The members of the Assembly of French Polynesia
recommend that the government of M. Oscar Temaru
continue its own analysis of thirty years of nuclear testing and
establish a method by which former workers at Moruora,
as well as the populations of islands close to the former testing
sites, are assured of adequate monitoring and health care.
They recommend that the government of
French Polynesia
and the French authorities cooperate in establishing truth and
justice in the matter of nuclear testing.
PS The members of the
Investigative Commission will present the results of their work
February 21, 2006 during a colloquium at the National Assembly in
Paris.
For further information: CDRPC,
tel: 33-4-78-36-93-03; cdrpc@obsarm.org
Synopsis
of the Inquiry Commission's Report
The work of the Inquiry Commission
concentrated on the period of French aerial nuclear testing between
1966 and 1974 which had sanitary, environmental, economic and social
consequences in French Polynesia.
By divulging, in their entirety, the
"secret" documents of the Defense Ministry dated 1965 to
1967, the report shows incontestable and precise proof of lying by the
authorities who conducted the nuclear testing. Although the
authorities maintained that the tests were clean and that the
radioactive fallout did not affect the population, the report shows
the contrary: each one of the tests conducted between 1966 and
1967 caused radioactive fallout on the islands in French Polynesia.
The meteorology system put in place
by the Direction of the Center of Nuclear Experimentation (DIRCEN) was
not only insufficient, but also incapable of foretelling the risks of
fallout. Contrary to the self satisfaction of the military
meteorologists who flaunted their efficacy, the Inquiry Commission
estimates that 14 weather stations within a territory of 5 million km2
(dimensions of Europe) were ridiculously insufficient.
After having auditioned government
ministers, medical experts and health workers, the Inquiry Commission
expresses its strong conviction that the aerial nuclear tests had
severe consequences for health, not only for those who worked on the
test sites, but for the entire population of French Polynesia.
The high amount of cancer of the thyroid in Polynesian women and the
worrisome development of acute myeloid leukemia show that radioactive
fallout is no stranger to these problems.
The report shows that certain
promises made by those responsible within the French government in
counter party for the implantation of nuclear testing in Polynesia
were not kept, and that regardless of considerable money injected by
France, conditions for long range development have not been met.
The visits made by the Inquiry
Commission, accompanied by experts in radiological analysis (CRIIRAD),
to the islands of Mangareva, Tureia and Hao have confirmed not only
the importance of the fallout of past nuclear testing still measurable
today, but also the extremely poor condition in which the population
and these islands were left by the military once the testing was
completed.
This report denounces the attitude
of the French institutions, who not only tried legal procedures to
attempt to annul the work of the Inquiry Commission formed within the
rules of a democratic society, but who also refused all requests for
information, and who refused to participate in any sort of debate.
In addition, after the visits of the Inquiry Commission to Tureia and
Mangareva, a delegation of the French Defense ministry went there to
put pressure on the municipalities and the population to destroy any
compromising traces (old "protective buildings") remaining
from the period of the aerial testing.
[The recommendations follow in their
entirety.]
Recommendations
As it concludes its work, the Inquiry Commission
of the French Polynesian Assembly wishes to recall the limits that
were set on it. Its mandate envisaged an analysis of the consequences
only of the period of atmospheric nuclear tests, from 1966 to 1974.
The Commission considers its contract fulfilled, although the
consequences, still evident years later, have obliged it to take into
account also the health, economic, and social realities of present-day
Polynesia
.
Some may wonder why no chapter of this report is devoted to the Moruroa
and Fangataufa atolls. This is not an
oversight but is intended to point out that the nuclear tests carried
out on these two Polynesian atolls have been, from the beginning in
1966 up to the present, forbidden to the investigation of elected
Polynesian officials [[[that from the beginning of testing in 1966 up
to the present, Polynesian officials have been forbidden to
investigate the nuclear tests carried out on these two Polynesian
atolls.]]] As we have
reported in the chapter on the elected officials, the few who have
gone to the sites at the invitation of the Armed Forces have had no
means of checking or verifying the statements of their military hosts.
For its part, the Inquiry Commission has requested of the Ministry of
Defense that a visit to the nuclear atolls be organized. We have had
neither acknowledgment nor response from this ministry. In this
situation, the Commission considered silence to be necessary.
The recommendations of the Inquiry Commission that are to be
validated by the French Polynesian Assembly are addressed mainly to
the government of the Country, which has established an organism to
pursue this matter: the “Orientation Council for follow-up on the
consequences of nuclear tests on the health of people and on the
environment.” It will be up to the government to accept and carry
out the recommendations of the Commission.
The Commission wishes, however, to make a prior recommendation
that it considers necessary so that the Country may have more complete
control of its own analysis of the consequences of the total program
of nuclear tests.
The Inquiry Commission recommends that the Orientation Council
carry out its own investigation into the consequences on health and on
the environment of underground tests, which are far from negligible
and which are a long-term concern.
I. Sites to be
cleaned up and rehabilitated
The Inquiry Commission went to the islands and atolls of
Gambier, Tureia, and Hao.
It found that the CEP, during the period of atmospheric tests,
permanently disturbed the environment and the daily life of the
people. Large areas remain
to be rehabilitated and cleaned up, in particular on Hao,
Tureia and Mangareva.
The future of certain military buildings (shelters, blockhouses
. . .) remains to be studied. Uncertainties
remain as to the radiological condition of certain sites that one now
knows may have been contaminated during atmospheric testing.
The Inquiry Commission proposes that complementary
investigations of radioactivity be programmed, as the preliminary
expert examination by the CRIIRAD recommends.
I.1 The Inquiry Commission proposes that the government of
French Polynesia
entrust to the “Orientation Council for follow-up on the
consequences of nuclear tests” the responsibility for constituting a
working group on “sites to be decontaminated and rehabilitated.”
The Inquiry Commission proposes that the method used rely on
two principles: transparency
and dialog with the partners concerned, that is to say the private
owners, municipalities, the Country and the State.
As needed, a mediator will be designated to resolve disputed
questions.
II. Waste and contaminated materials
The Commission has been informed by many sources (witnesses,
documents, photographs . . .) about the discharge of contaminated
materials in the ocean (or in lagoons).
The transparency proclaimed by the Ministry of Defense and the
application of the principal of precaution for future generations
require that information on these discharges be communicated to the
Country.
II.1 The
Inquiry Commission recommends to the government of the Country that
discussions with the State be entered into to put into effect the
following measures:
--An inventory of radioactive waste discarded in the ocean:
nature of the waste, date of discharge, place of discharge
--Cartography of the sites where Vulture (“Vautour”)
airplanes were discarded in the ocean in 1974
--Cartography of other discharge sites in the sea or lagoons
The destination and the management of radioactive
waste that could be recovered will be studied jointly by a
State-Country working group.
III.
A radiological analysis laboratory for the Country
The information collected by the Inquiry Commission in regard
to the radiological status of certain zones or atolls used for the
nuclear testing program will necessitate that the sampling and
analysis be carried out under the authority of the Country.
The experience of the Inquiry Commission has shown that the
collaboration of similar services of the State (LESE for example) is
not assured.
III.1. The Inquiry Commission
recommends that a radiological analysis laboratory be created and put
in the service of the Country. The
laboratory project attached to these recommendations could serve as a
starting point for its establishment.
IV. Center
for archives and the memory of the nuclear tests
In the course of its work, the Inquiry Commission ran into
difficulty in obtaining the information and the numerous documents
that relate to the nuclear tests carried out in the Country.
The history of this period and its consequences for the future
of the Country is the other hand greatly misunderstood by the
Polynesians themselves and in particular by the young generations.
IV.l The
Inquiry Commission recommends that there be created, in the framework
of the institutions of the Country, an institute that is a center for
archives and the memory of the nuclear tests and is at the disposal of
the public.
This institute could take on an international character by
enlarging its subject to the nuclear tests
carried out by the major powers, notably in the Pacific.
This institute will be provided with buildings, personnel, and
a budget. It will collect
all the available documentation, written and audiovisual, on the
nuclear tests.
This institute will have the capability of presenting
documents, expositions at the disposal of all Polynesians and also of
tourists visiting the country.
IV.2 The
Inquiry Commission recommends that an independent commission of
historians be established for the study of the nuclear test period in
Polynesia
.
IV. 3 The
Inquiry Commission recommends that the memory of all the Polynesians
who have worked at the nuclear test sites since 1963 be preserved and
especially of all those who have already died.
For this purpose, the Inquiry Commission asks mayors and
families in the Country to make a list of all the former workers who
have died and to communicate this information to the Orientation
Council. The Inquiry
Commission approves of the project of a memorial on nuclear testing
proposed by Moruroa e tatou
and recommends that the government of the Country contribute to its
realization.
V. Medical Monitoring
During its hearings and its visits to Mangareva,
Tureia and Hao,
the Inquiry Commission was confronted with numerous health questions
from the people to whom it spoke.
The Inquiry Commission recalls its “personal conviction”
that the nuclear tests have affected public health throughout
French Polynesia
.
V.1 The
Inquiry Commission recommends to the government of the Country that it
establish a “unit for medical-social monitoring” of the
populations that were “nearest” to the nuclear tests, former
workers at Moruroa and their families,
populations of the islands and atolls near to Moruroa
. The composition and the
tasks of that “unit for a socio-medical follow up” will be studied
by the “Orientation Council.”
V. 2 The Inquiry
Commission recommends the financing of specific scientific studies
concerning people and communities considered to be most affected by
nuclear risks, notably populations of the islands and atolls “under
the wind of the aerial tests” and former workers at Moruroa
and their families. “Basic”
studies on the follow up of these populations could be carried out
with the help of the University in order to permit epidemiologists and
researchers to build their research on serious sociological and
anthropological bases.
In this framework, the Inquiry Commission recommends the
creation of a DNA bank in
Polynesia
under the responsibility of the Blood Transfusion Center.
V.3
The Inquiry Commission recommends that scientific
studies on illnesses considered to be induced by radioactivity be
carried out and in particular that funding and personnel be given to
the Country’s Cancer Registry.
V.4 The
Inquiry Commission recommends to the government of the Country that it
encourage the State to place on the parliamentary agenda legislation
that recognizes the “principal of presumption” according to the
methods accepted by the Inquiry Commission in the chapter on health.
VI. Economic
Development
The thirty years of the CEP have not truly contributed to the
sustainable development of
French Polynesia
. Heavy infrastructure was
promised to the elected representatives of the Polynesians in return
for the problems caused by the establishment of the CEP.
These promises have not been kept.
VI.1 The
Inquiry Commission recommends to the government that it enter into
discussion with the State on the creation and financing of
infrastructure that would give
Polynesia
the means for sustainable development, absolute priority being given
to the highway crossing
Tahiti
.
VI.2 The
Inquiry Commission recommends that the government enter into
discussion with the Social Protection Office, the ministries
concerned, and the association Moruroa e Tatou
to resolve the possible economic damage suffered by former workers at Moruroa
(annuities not taken into account in the calculation of pensions,
recognition of professional illnesses . . . ).
VII Relations
with the State
Ten years after the end of testing, the Inquiry Commission
believes that disputes between the State and the Country on the
consequences of nuclear testing must be settled.
For their part, elected officials and the government of the
Country have put in place the means to constitute their own expertise
on thirty years of nuclear testing, which remains to be exercised.
VII.1 The
Inquiry Commission recommends to the government of the Country that it
solicit the authorities of the State in order that an authority
with equal representation on both sides may be established for dialog
and discussion on the nuclear tests.
VII.2 The
Inquiry Commission recommends to the government of the Country that it
asks officials of the State to communicate all the reports on fallout
from aerial tests during the 1966-1974 period.
VII.3 The
Inquiry Commission recommends to the government of the Country that a
renegotiation of the “development plan” in compensation for the
nuclear tests be established to permit the financing of the
recommendations of the Inquiry Commission.
VII.4 The
Inquiry Commission recommends to the government of the Country that it
negotiate with the State the participation of experts and of people
designated by the Country in the monitoring of the atolls of Moruroa
and Fangataufa.
The laboratory for radiological analysis created by the Country
will be associated with the surveillance system at present managed
only by the Ministry of Defense.
VII. 5
The Inquiry Commission recommends to the government of
the Country that discussion with the State on the revision of the
legal status of the atolls of Moruroa and Fangataufa
be undertaken.
Posted
January 26, 2006