www.earthisland.org/yggdrasil

 

 

Nicolas Sarkozy in Algeria: To Repair and Restore the Sites of French Nuclear Testing in the Algerian Sahara?

 

[Translation of a press release issued December 3, 2007 by the Observatoire des Armements/CDRC]

 

Hasn’t the time come for the French government to remove the veil of secrecy and to undertake discussions with the Algerian government on that painful page in the history of Franco-Algerian relations, in order to undertake with a common agreement concrete activities of “restoration” and “reparation”?

 

On the occasion of the voyage of the President of the Republic in Algeria, Damoclès is publishing a special number giving the state of the site in Reggane and formulating a series of recommendations for the attention of the French government.  “The nuclear tests have caused contamination of the zone, which is still measurable after forty years, and France left the site without removing its waste or even fencing it in,” complains Bruno Barrillot who visited the site November 13 to 19 with a team from French television (Larbi Benchicha producer and journalist for France 3 West and Hervé Portanguen photographer).

 

At Reggane, in the heart of the Algerian Sahara, between 1960 and 1961, France carried out four atmospheric tests.  These were followed by thirteen underground tests at In-Eker in the Hoggar massif between 1961 and 1966.  Between 1961 and 1963, 35 other explosive tests with “little balls of plutonium” were likewise carried out in wells at the Reggane site.

 

In Algeria, it has taken forty years for the political will to take responsibility for the consequences of nuclear testing in the Sahara, to appear.  At the request of the Algerian government, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) carried out a study of the sites of Reggane and In-Eker in 1999. Then, in February 2006, the Algerian government went further by organizing an international meeting at Algiers “on the environmental and health consequences of the nuclear tests” followed by a visit to the site of In-Eker, and then authorizing a visit to Reganne in November.

 

The French government has just made a gesture by giving the Algerian government maps showing the location of antipersonnel mines buried during the Algerian War.  In Polynesia the work of rehabilitating the test sites and the medical follow-up have been set up by the defense ministry.  We submit for the discussion of the Algerian and French president six recommendations to regulate the testing issue in Algeria.*

 

The special issue of Damoclès, no. 21, November 2007, can be ordered for 3 euros from the Observatoire des Armements/CDRPC, 187 montée de Choulans, 69005 Lyon, France:  www.obsarm.org .

 

Contact:  Patrice Bouveret, in France,  tel. (0)4-78-37-93-03.

 

                                                                                        ###

 

*The Recommendations, translated from Damoclès, no. 121, Nov. 2007, follow:

                                               

  1. The measures to fence off the site taken by the Algerian government are necessary and welcome, but can be only preliminary. It is probably impossible to prevent human intrusions onto these old test sites, and even less so dispersion by wind of some contaminated materials.

Measurements of the radioactivity of the four Gerboise sites could be made by means of the techniques already used on the Hao atoll [in Polynesia]. Mapping of the gamma radiation of soils could be done using a detection device placed on a helicopter and by taking soil samples and core samples from suspect areas. (1) If need be, cooperation with the French government could be sought.

 

Once the mapping of the radiological situation of the firing field is accomplished, it would probably be possible to assemble and stock the radioactive elements thus detected in an appropriate site to be constructed on the firing field or nearby.

 

  1. We do not have precise information on the location of burial sites for materials contaminated after exposure to the Gerboise firings. We do have photos of some burials (e.g. Vautour aircraft, metals) proving that such activity took place. By referring to information given by the Ministry of Defense to Polynesian authorities concerning the nature, the sites,  and the dates of  disposal of contaminated wastes, it should be possible to obtain the same kind of information for burial operations effected on the former Saharan test sites.  Within the framework  of Franco-Algerian relations, the question of mapping of these burial sites should be brought up. The objective is to secure the

     sites and to regroup wastes in conformity with the norms of international regulations.

 

  1. We support the legitimate demand of Algerian authorities who wish to obtain the plans [maps] of  CEA [Atomic Energy Commission]  underground installations beneath the Reggane Plateau military base.  A comprehensive plan for environmental rehabilitation of the CEA site should also be proposed. 

 

  1. In view of actions undertaken by the French government  in French Polynesia, notably the “tracking of the health of former civilian and military workers at the Pacific experiment stations and of populations living or having lived near to nuclear experiment sites” (2) and in response to suggestions of hospital authorities in Reggane, the establishment of a health tracking mission for Algerians having worked on the Saharan test sites and of populations living or having lived near to nuclear sites should be negotiated between the Algerian and French governments.

 

  1. So that they might benefit from the same rights as the Polynesian personnel who worked at the Pacific Experiment Center, we recommend to the Ministry of Defense authorities the establishment of a list of all local personnel recruited to work on the Saharan test sites.    

 

  1. The French government should respect requests for information and for access to nuclear test archives from Algerian authorities. The latter base their claims on the fact that most of the French nuclear experiments were carried out after Algeria became independent,  and 

          they judge that this fact gives them a right to know what was done on their own territory.

­­­­­­­­

 

1)  F. Fouret, W. Delahaye, C. Musa, Evaluation radiologique du grand motu nord de l’atoll de Hao, SCEN, November 1999.

2)  Convention no. 160-07, Republic of French Polynesia, 29 August 2007.

 

                                                                                            --translation by Robert M. Davis

 

Home