Conservative and clean tech groups unite against tariff that would drive up solar costs in the US
Earlier this year, a bankrupt domestic manufacturer of solar equipment brought a trade case in front of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC). The allegation? That foreign manufacturers of solar modules are unfairly hurting US manufacturing. A USITC recommendation to slap tariffs on solar module imports, a result of the case, now sits on President Trump’s desk — he is the sole and final decision maker on the issue. Such a tariff could significantly increase the cost of solar energy in the US.
photo by 100% Campaign, Flickr
The case — known as “Section 201” within the industry due to the relevant section of the 1974 Trade Act — stems from a complaint filed by Suniva, a Georgia-based manufacturer of solar modules, alleging that solar module imports are damaging domestic manufacturing. Suniva asked the government to impose tariffs or minimum-price-floors on imported solar modules. Although the manufacturer had already declared bankruptcy when they brought the complaint, they thought that a tariff could support the value of their assets. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), the main industry group for the solar industry, quickly came out against the petition request.
The case involves a lot of moving parts and competing motives by the involved parties. SQN Capital Management, an “alternative investment manager” and Suniva’s main creditor, forced Suniva to file a complaint with the USITC as a condition of their bankruptcy filing. In a letter to a Chinese trade group, SQN then tried to leverage the trade case into a buy-out, suggesting that if Suniva’s equipment were purchased that there would then be nobody left to pursue the case. But the buy-out never occurred, and the trade case has been moving along. Suniva was later joined by SolarWorld Americas, another bankrupt solar manufacturer.
Because the economics of solar are often thin, putting a tariff or price floor on solar module imports would lead to price increases that could damage the ability to economically install large solar facilities. Industry analysts projected that 88,000 jobs and nearly 50 percent of projected solar installations would be at risk if Suniva’s requests were met, a huge blow to communities and the climate. A prominent lawyer for Stoel Rives, Morten Lund, told GreenTech Media that new tariffs could “completely obliterate the utility market” in states like Texas, in reference …more
Growth must go on – it’s the political imperative everywhere, and it’s destroying Earth
Everyone wants everything – how is that going to work? The promise of economic growth is that the poor can live like the rich and the rich can live like the oligarchs. But already we are bursting through the physical limits of the planet that sustains us. Climate breakdown, soil loss, the collapse of habitats and species, the sea of plastic, insectageddon: all are driven by rising consumption. The promise of private luxury for everyone cannot be met: neither the physical nor the ecological space exists.
Photo by Diariocritico de Venezuela /Flickr
But growth must go on: this is everywhere the political imperative. And we must adjust our tastes accordingly. In the name of autonomy and choice, marketing uses the latest findings in neuroscience to break down our defenses. Those who seek to resist must, like the Simple Lifers in Brave New World, be silenced – in this case by the media.
With every generation, the baseline of normalized consumption shifts. Thirty years ago, it was ridiculous to buy bottled water, where tap water is clean and abundant. Today, worldwide, we use a million plastic bottles a minute.
Every Friday is a Black Friday, every Christmas a more garish festival of destruction. Among the snow saunas, portable watermelon coolers and smartphones for dogs with which we are urged to fill our lives, my #extremecivilisation prize now goes to the PancakeBot: a 3D batter printer that allows you to eat the Mona Lisa, the Taj Mahal, or your dog’s bottom every morning. In practice, it will clog up your kitchen for a week until you decide you don’t have room for it. For junk like this, we’re trashing the living planet, and our own prospects of survival. Everything must go.
The ancillary promise is that, through green consumerism, we can reconcile perpetual growth with planetary survival. But a series of research papers reveal there is no significant difference between the ecological footprints of people who care and people who don’t. One recent article, published in the journal Environment and Behaviour, says those who identify themselves as conscious …more
Bad news piles up for company over Keystone XL pipeline
As millions celebrate Thanksgiving, the bosses at TransCanada will not be in a cheerful, festive mood.
They will be wondering what went wrong over the last week, after they seem to have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
Photo by maisa_nyc/Flickr
This time last week, the company was seen to be one regulatory announcement away from completing its highly controversial Keystone XL (KXL) pipeline, which will transport the dirty tar sands of Canada to the Gulf Coast refineries in the US.
But everything started to go wrong last Thursday, when the company suffered its first mishap by spilling some 210,000 gallons of crude across farmland in Dakota. It was the third major spill along the KXL route in ten years.
Estimates of the exact size of the spill vary, but Vice News later reported local landowners saying the spill could be as large as 600,000 gallons. Kent Moeckly, a landowner and member of the Dakota Rural Action Group, told VICE News that TransCanada thought it was 200,000 gallons. What we found out working with TransCanada, it could very well be 600,000 gallons.”
So that was mishap one for the company.
The spill came days before a crucial meeting of the Nebraska Public Service Commission, which was voting on whether to allow a 275-mile section of the pipeline to be built through the state. It was seen as the last significant regulatory hurdle for the pipeline.
The one thing working in the company’s favor is that, as the New York Times reported before the decision, “under Nebraska law, the state Public Service Commission is not allowed to consider pipeline safety and spill risks when deciding on a permit.”
So crucially for the company the Commission could not take the spill into consideration. And although on Monday they voted 3-2 in favor of allowing the pipeline to be built, they also voted for what is known officially as the Mainline Alternative Route. This is not what the company wanted.
As I blogged on Tuesday: “It would be wrong to see this as a victory for TransCanada. You could actually see it as a defeat … Instead of getting their preferred route, the company now has to go and persuade dozens of …more
In Conversation with Yatri Niehaus, director of new documentary Stella Polaris Ulloriarsuaq
Photo courtesy of Stella Polaris Ulloriarsuaq
Stella Polaris Ulloriarsuaq had its world premiere at the 2017 LA Film Festival. In addition to stunning cinematography of Greenland, the documentary also explores how global warming affects the island’s Native people. By focusing on how climate change impacts human beings and their culture, Stella is distinct from other nonfiction eco-docs that zoom in more on the environment and wildlife, such as 2017’s The Penguin Counters, which concentrated on how a heating planet changes the lives of chinstrap penguins in Antarctica.
Director Yatri Niehaus grew up in the Canary Islands, an autonomous region of Spain located off of the coast of Africa. His father was from Ghana, his mother from Germany. Previously, Niehaus wrote and helmed shorts, such as the 2012 Karim. Stella Polaris Ulloriarsuaq is his breakthrough directorial debut of a feature-length film. Niehaus discusses Stella Polaris Ulloriarsuaq and more in this exclusive interview.
Tell us a bit about your background. Where were you born and raised? Where did you study cinema? What other films have you've worked on?
I was born in Berlin, Germany, but grew up on small and beautiful island in the Atlantic, called La Gomera. It’s a great place to be as a kid, but as I grew older, it had its limitations. I studied directing at the University for Television and Film in Munich, Germany, and I'm now working on my thesis film. I live in Berlin, though. I’ve made a couple of short films at my school, but Stella Polaris is really my first film that I'm not keeping in the proverbial poison cabinet.
How did Stella Polaris Ulloriarsuaq come about?
Nomi Baumgartl, Sven Nieder, and Laali Lyberth had worked on Stella Polaris for a while before I came on board. Nomi had, after having worked on another Greenland-themed photo art project called Arctic Message, envisioned a photo art and film project for Stella Polaris. She was a long-time friend of the late Gerhard Pilz, who was a professor at my school and they had planned to involve students from the documentary class. Unfortunately he passed away before that could happen, and so they ended up asking students directly if someone would like to participate.
I didn’t know too much about the photo art project itself when I first heard about it. But the prospect of going on an adventure to Greenland intrigued me, so I applied. And since there was hardly any funding, it was unclear …more
Can an army of pranksters spur interest in the climate fight?
“Laughter is the best medicine.” Like every cliché, this old adage springs from a kernel of truth. And in these distressing political times, a good dose of laughter may be just what the doctor ordered, particularly when it comes to the challenging task of addressing climate chaos.
Photo courtesy of Stepping Up Podcast
The Stepping Up podcast is taking laughter very seriously in its third episode, “Clowning Around.”
“I like to think of it as a lifestyle. Being a prankster activist is a lifestyle choice,” says Larry Bogad, the star of the “Clowning Around” story and a veteran political prankster. He has spent a lifetime creating spectacles on the street, in the halls of government, and in corporate board rooms. Bogad always shows up with his First Amendment tote bag, packed with the costumes and paraphernalia he might need to create a scene.
And a lot of his foolishness is laser focused on the climate conundrum. His Clown Army, dressed in classic red noses and rainbow wigs, shows up at a climate protest to shower the police with flowers and kisses. In a black cassock, Bogad plays the priest, leading a funeral procession for the last ice on Earth. Posing as an officer of the fictitious Oil Enforcement Agency, he slips into an auto trade show to wrap gas guzzling SUVs in police tape. A thrift store suit and a business card serve as entrée into a meeting of oil execs, or a press conference, or a TV talk show where Bogad and his pals have slipped in under the guise of legitimate company VPs to denounce drilling and pronounce the end of oil.
Clowning around, creative pranksterism, collective buffoonery, beautiful trouble, serious play; these are various ways in which Bogad characterizes what he is doing. On the surface, it all looks like fun and games. But the underlying goal is to get our attention and get us to take action. People turn away from a flier proffered on the street and doze off during a power point presentation. But Bogad’s wild and crazy antics, which point to the contradictions and lies embedded in American climate policy, may just get us to stop, laugh, and join the conversation.
These pranks occur in a specific time and place. But their effect is magnified by what Bogad calls “earned media coverage.” …more
Pipeline opponents have 30 days to appeal the decision
Less than five minutes into this morning’s meeting of the Nebraska Public Service Commission (PSC), regulators voted three to two to approve the “mainline alternative route” of the Keystone XL pipeline. And with that, the last hurdle facing Canadian company TransCanada was cleared leaving, paving the way for construction of the controversial pipeline. Nebraska was the last state reviewing the pipeline – the other states through which KXL will pass have already approved the project.
Photo by Alex Matzke / Bold Nebraska
Before the vote, Nebraska District 2 Commissioner Crystal Rhoades spoke for two minutes against the pipeline route citing six main areas of concern including the fragile ecosystem through which the pipeline would travel, the lack of positive economic impact for the state, and the lack of consultation with the Native American tribes in the region.
TransCanada submitted three routes for approval including the company’s preferred route as well as a mainline alternative route and a Sandhills route. Commissioners Frank E. Landis Jr., Tim Schram, and Rod Johnson voted to approve the mainline alternative route, while Rhoades and Mary Ridder voted against.
The 1,179-mile Keystone XL pipeline will transport more than 800,000 barrels per day of tar sands crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta to Steele City, Nebraska where it will be connected to the Keystone pipeline system and run to refineries and export terminals in the Gulf of Mexico. President Obama blocked the project in 2015 citing its impacts on climate change, but President Trump reversed his decision earlier this year.
Approval of the $8-billion project came despite a section of the Keystone pipeline leaking almost 800,000 liters of oil in nearby South Dakota just last week before being shut down by TransCanada on November 16.
Opponents have vigorously fought the pipeline, including through the construction of solar panels in Nebraska along its proposed route. Despite the loss, environmental and Indigenous groups vowed to continue the fight against the Keystone XL.
“Today’s decision is no guarantee that this pipeline will ever be built. Nebraska opted not to give TransCanada its preferred route through the state, so the company now has more hurdles in front of its beleaguered pipeline,” said Greenpeace Canada Climate and Energy Campaigner Mike Hudema. “Given last week's reminder of the dangers pipelines …more
UN negotiations lay the groundwork for implementing the landmark Paris deal, though difficult decisions lay ahead
The world’s nations were confident they were making important progress in turning continued political commitment into real world action, as the global climate change summit in Bonn was drawing to a close on Friday.
The UN talks were tasked with the vital, if unglamorous, task of converting the unprecedented global agreement sealed in Paris in 2015 from a symbolic moment into a set of rules by which nations can combine to defeat global warming. Currently, the world is on track for at least 3C of global warming — a catastrophic outcome that would lead to severe impacts around the world.
photo by Takver, Flickr
The importance of the task was emphasized by Frank Bainimarama, Fiji’s prime minister and president of the summit: “We are not simply negotiating words on a page, but we are representing all our people and the places they call home.”
The Paris rulebook, which must be finalized by the end of 2018, now has a skeleton: a set of headings relating to how action on emissions is reported and monitored. Nations have also fleshed this out with suggested detailed texts, but these are often contradictory and will need to be resolved next year. “The worst outcome would have been to end up with empty pages, but that is not going to happen,” said a German negotiator.
One issue that did flare up during talks was the action being taken by rich nations before the Paris deal kicks in in 2020. Developing nations argued not enough is being done and, with the UN climate negotiations running largely on trust, the issue became unexpectedly serious before being defused by commitments to a “stocktake” of action in 2018 and 2019.
The final hours of the negotiations were held up by a technical row over climate funding from rich nations, always a sensitive topic. Poorer and vulnerable nations want donor countries to set out in advance how much they will provide and when, so recipient nations can plan their climate action. Rich nations claim they are not unwilling, but that making promises on behalf of future governments is legally complex.