I don't want to be remembered as part of a generation that saw the signs and did nothing as their planet was destroyed
My name is Hallie Turner. I live in Raleigh, North Carolina, and I am a 12-year old climate activist and member of the iMatter Youth Council.
I got involved with climate activism almost by accident. The topic came up at dinner one night in fourth grade. I had heard about climate change and knew it was bad, but I had never fully understood it. The next time I went to the library, I discovered Al Gore’s book An Inconvenient Truth. Just as iMatter’s founder Alec Loorz was inspired by Al Gore's documentary, I was inspired by the book. Deciding to read that book was one of the most important decisions I have ever made.
My first reaction to what I read was, “Wow. This can't be real.” I couldn't believe that an issue that big could exist, that we had caused all these horrible things to happen to our planet.
My second reaction was, “Why doesn't everyone know about this?” The pictures were there, the facts were there. It was so obvious to me, a nine-year-old, that this issue was severe. Why wasn't this being talked about every day? Why was nothing being done about this? And how could people deny that climate change was happening?
My third thought was that I wanted to get involved. I started doing more research about the issue. I wanted to do something right then and there.
In today's busy lifestyle, I think it's good just to take a step back and think “Wow. I'm insanely lucky to live on this astounding, spectacular, ever-changing planet. There's only one Earth, with so many wonderful species and habitats and people and ideas and creations. It's a privilege just to be here.” We live on such a beautiful planet and have been blessed with opportunities to make it even MORE amazing. We have so much capacity to do MORE with what we've been given. And yet some of us still refuse to listen. Some of us still won't take action when the jaw-dropping pictures and facts are staring us right in the face.
This is what inspired me. But as I did more research, I became increasingly frustrated about the lack of opportunities for kids my age …more
Surfers and environmentalists have launched a campaign to have the San Miguel beach and watershed protected as a state park
San Miguel in Baja, California, is said to be where the first wave was surfed in all of Mexico. The area also contains one of the last intact riparian corridors in all of northern Baja — the San Miguel watershed. This critical riparian ecosystem leads up to the beach, bringing with it sand and rocks that pile up and create a rock land formation that provides perfect conditions for a classic, long wave that wraps around the beach. The waves draw thousands of surfers to the area every year.
Photo by courtesy of Surfing for Change
The watershed, additionally, is also critical habitat for a number of native and endemic species, an important source of drinking water for local residents, and provides a needed open space for the beachside community of Ensenada. But like every other beachfront area, the San Miguel watershed and the iconic waves it helps create face a slew of pressing threats such as continued urban development, sand mining, and trash dumping.
In the face of these threats, a coalition of local and international environmental and surfing groups are backing an initiative by the Mexican environmental organization Pronatura Noroeste, to preserve 58 hectares of the San Miguel beach and watershed as a state park. “We have the chance to do something proactive, and protect something before it needs saving”, says Nik Strong-Cvetich, Executive Director of Save The Waves Coalition, one of the groups supporting the park initiative. (Other groups include SurfEns, Wildcoast and the Bahía de Todos Santos World Surfing Reserve.)
As part of this campaign, former Brower Youth Award winner Kyle Thiermann and his organization Surfing for Change have created a short documentary that explores the connection between the health of the San Miguel watershed, the quality of the classic wave here, and the campaign launched by surfing and environmental groups to protect the area.
Through the campaign, Save The Waves and World Surfing Reserve local partners will be trying to deliver 10,000 signatures to the Governor of Baja California to show local and international support for creation of the San Miguel State Park. Save The Waves will also demonstrate …more
How one man transformed an isolated, barren sandbar in northeastern India into a lush, wildlife sanctuary
It's 3:30 a.m. Jadav “Molai” Payeng, and his wife and three children wake-up and get busy milking, feeding, and bathing their 90-odd cows and buffalos. By 8:00 a.m. the milk is put in containers to be ferried to the nearby town of Johart in the northeastern Indian state of Assam. After a brief nap and early lunch, the children leave for school, while Payeng pulls out his bag of seeds and saplings and canoes to the nearby Mekhai islet. “This is my new plantation site of about 500 hectares,” he says. After a brief pause, he muses, “This should keep me busy for another 30 years.”
Photo by Jitu Kalita
Payeng, 54, is no ordinary man. He belongs to the Mising tribe of northeast India, and lives on Majuli Island in Assam. He is a dairy farmer by profession but a green crusader by passion. Since 1979, Payeng has been planting trees to save his river island from vanishing due to soil erosion. To date, he has planted a forest of 550 hectares, larger than New York City's Central Park, on an islet off of Majuli island. The forest is called “Molai Sanctuary” — Molai is Payeng’s nickname — and provides refuge to varied wildlife, including several rhinoceros, elephants, and tigers.
Majuli is located in the middle of Brahmaputra River, in northeastern India. It is the world's largest river island, and is home to about 200,000 people. Over the last 100 years, Majuli has experienced severe soil erosion due to monsoon flooding and excessive sediment discharge of fine silt and clay from the island caused by low-magnitude seismic events. As a consequence, since 1914, Majuli's surface area has shrunk from 733 square kilometers to 522 square kilometers. Scientists say that climate change may have contributed to intensified flooding in recent years, accelerating the rate of erosion. Now, much of the riverbank has been reduced to barren sandbar islets, and scientists fear that in 15 to 20 years, Majuli could shrink and be completely submerged by the river.
It's one of these desolate sandbar islets, named Aruna sapori, that Payeng set forth to transform into a lush green paradise. It all began back in 1979 when Payeng was a teenager and the annual monsoon brought hundreds of snakes …more
New York City and Boston’s watershed management programs preserve rural landscapes while providing clean water to urban areas
Environmental disasters oozing from man’s follies are all too familiar. But what about the environmental serendipities? The unexpected habitats where souls and eagles soar? Some of those places can be found by following the water back from your faucet to its source.
Photo by s58y/Flickr
Before New York and Boston were baseball competitors, they shared a certain wisdom about the design of their drinking water supplies. To Boston’s west sits the Quabbin and Wachusetts reservoirs. North of New York City stretches that great metropolis’ water sources — the Croton and Catskill-Delaware watersheds. Gravity is a good friend to these port cities. Both receive their water, largely unfiltered and un-pumped, from protected watersheds in the hills.
Back in the nineteenth century, stagnant, foul water and a spate of dysentery could lose you an election. Angry communities clamoring for water made nasty headlines and pushed politicians to direct engineers and urban planners to find safe water sources. With populations booming in the 1800s, Boston and New York looked to their hinterlands to quench their growing thirst.
Development of rural water sources wasn’t a walk in the park. Rural communities don’t tend to be enamored with ceding control of their natural resources to satisfy insatiable urban areas on a seemingly never-ending trajectory of expansion and encroachment. New York and Boston’s rural neighbors were no exception. And for good reason. Many of these communities were flooded to create reservoirs, and fences were erected to keep people out of protected watersheds.
Leaving aside that ill will for a moment, the immediate consequence of tapping distant source water was a steady, healthy flow to the cities, far from urban contaminants. Slower to emerge, were expanses of wilderness, which surfaced as flooded rural towns rotted under reservoir silt. Today, the New York watershed protects 1972 square miles of land and the Boston watershed protects another 156 square miles — a combined landmass considerably larger than Yosemite National Park, and one which is a valuable habitat for moose, fishers, and bears. These watershed protection programs are stitched together with a mosaic …more
With 92 arrests to date, We Are Seneca Lake campaign is gaining momentum
For six weeks, We Are Seneca Lake campaigners have braved freezing weather in western New York to block expansion of a methane storage project adjacent to Seneca Lake, the largest of the Finger Lakes. Campaigners believe the storage project threatens to contaminate Seneca Lake, which provides drinking water to 100,000 people in upstate New York. With 92 arrests for trespassing while blocking the gates to the storage facility, the campaign seems to be picking up steam.
Photo by We Are Seneca Lake
The We Are Seneca Lake movement took shape on October 23 when protesters blocked the gates to Texas-based energy company Crestwood Midstream’s storage facility north of Watkins Glen, NY. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) authorized Crestwood to begin expansion of its methane storage facility beginning on October 24. After legal efforts to stop the expansion failed, opponents began a civil disobedience campaign, and the first 10 campaigners were arrested on October 29.
We Are Seneca Lake Organizers have good reason to be concerned. Besides serving as a source of local drinking water, Seneca Lake supports the two primary pillars of the local economy: tourism and wine-making. The region also supports an historic salt industry, fed by salt deposits surrounding the lake. When Crestwood purchased a local salt plant in 2013, the company also acquired nearly 90 caverns created in the salt mining process. These caverns currently have the capacity to store 1.5 billion cubic feet of methane gas and LPG. Crestwood, hoping to turn the Seneca Lake into a regional hub for natural gas transportation and storage, hopes to expand storage capacity to 2 billion cubic feet, with long-term plans to expand capacity to 10 billion cubic feet.
“This is a really compelling story about people who care about a lake that provides drinking water for 100,000 people, that literally turns water into wine, and people who are standing up for water and wine against a Houston-based trespasser who has come into our community not with the intent of living peacefully among us, but with the stated intent to its investors and to the [Securities and Exchange Commission] of turning Fingerlakes region into ‘a hub for the transportation and distribution of natural gas …more
The Senate may consider the bill as soon as Tuesday. Take action!
Last Thursday, the US House of Representatives voted to transfer protected public lands, sacred to the Apache people, to foreign mining corporations digging for copper. Near the town of Superior, AZ, these areas include the Oak Flat Campground enjoyed by campers, hikers, climbers, birders, and other outdoor enthusiasts. It is also the site of Apache Leap — a cliff overlooking Superior where, according to legend, some 75 Apache warriors who found themselves surrounded by the US cavalry leapt to their deaths rather than face capture. The site is sacred to Native Americans.
Photo by Matthew Batchelder
If at First You Don’t Succeed
On two earlier occasions during this Congress, the House attempted to pass HR 687, the Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2013. (. Proponents intended this bill as the vehicle to make this copper mine possible. Both times they failed, abruptly pulling the bill from the House floor after voting had already started. Read about the earlier attempts here)
They simply didn’t have the votes for passage — another embarrassing misstep for House leadership whose job it is to know their caucus vote counts. And opposition to HR 687 continues to grow, particularly among House Republicans who represent Native American communities.
If You Can’t Beat ’em, Join ’em
Because this bill could not pass the House on its own, supporters decided to attach it to a larger package with some really good public lands bills that expand National Parks, Wilderness areas, and Wild and Scenic Rivers. And this large package was attached again to a still larger piece of must-pass legislation that funds our military.
Many of our valued conservation allies worked tirelessly to preserve some of the critically important precious lands and rivers that also made it into this Defense bill. Their efforts deserve praise and celebration for the special areas now protected and off limits to mining, drilling, and other destructive development.
Government indifference is matched by widespread public ignorance about the climate impact of high levels of meat-eating
As negotiators in the Peruvian capital of Lima engage in the latest round of multinational talks aimed at finding ways of reducing global greenhouse gas emissions, one issue will be conspicuous in its absence — animal farming.
The rearing of livestock and meat consumption accounts for 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions – not to mention its relatively inefficient use of water, land and crops – yet few governments are willing to discuss options for reducing its impact.
Photo by David Oliver
As well as carbon emissions from deforestation (for pasture or crops to feed animals), the livestock sector is also the largest source of methane (from cattle) and nitrous oxide emissions (from fertiliser and manure), two particularly potent greenhouse gases. There are already more than 22 billion chickens in the world — more than three per person — with global consumption of meat predicted to rise 76 percent by 2050, against a 2005-7 baseline. By that date we will be growing more crops to feed directly to animals than ourselves.
So why the lack of political action? Government’s around the world have initiated policies to reduce energy use in homes, industry, and cars, but have been reluctant to legislate against meat. The only flicker of ambition, if you could call it that, has been in Europe where The Netherlands and Sweden included climate change considerations in their dietary recommendations to citizens. The UK has also urged consumers to “moderate” their meat consumption and switch to a diet of more peas, beans, nuts, and other sources of protein with “relatively lower environmental cost.”
This government indifference is matched by widespread public ignorance about the impact of high levels of meat-eating on climate change, according to a recently published survey of consumers in 12 countries, including Brazil, China, India, the United Kingdom and United States, commissioned by the UK-based think tank Chatham House.
Twice as many respondents identified direct transport emissions as a major contributor to climate change as identified meat and dairy production, despite them having almost equal contributions. And as many as one-quarter of respondents stated that meat and dairy production contributes little or nothing to climate change. Climate change was …more