New EPA chief worked with major energy companies, Koch groups to roll back environmental regulations
By Steve Horn, Sharon Kelly and Graham Readfearn
The Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) has published thousands of emails obtained from the office of former Oklahoma Attorney General, Scott Pruitt, who was recently sworn in as the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the Trump Administration.
Photo U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Housed online in searchable form by CMD, the emails cover Pruitt's time spent as the Sooner State's lead legal advocate, and in particular show a “close and friendly relationship between Scott Pruitt’s office and the fossil fuel industry,” CMD said in a press release. CMD was forced to go to court in Oklahoma to secure the release of the emails, which had sat in a queue for two years after the organization had filed an open records request.
Among other things, the emails show extensive communication with hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) giant Devon Energy, with Pruitt's office not only involved in discussions with Devon about energy-related issues like proposed U.S. Bureau of Land Management fracking rules, but also more tangential matters like how a proposed airline merger might affect Devon's international travel costs. They also show a close relationship with groups such as the Koch Industries-funded Americans for Prosperity and the Oklahoma Public Policy Council, the latter a member of the influential conservative State Policy Network (SPN).
On the BLM fracking rule, Priutt's office solicited input from Devon, the Oklahoma City fracking company, which seemed to incorporate the feedback in the company's formal legal response. Pruitt's office was aiming to sue the BLM on the proposed rules, a case multiple states eventually won, getting indispensible aid in the effort from the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC).
“Any suggestions?” Pruitt's office wrote in a May 1, 2013 email to a Devon vice president. Attachments missing from the FOIA response make it unclear to what extent edits suggested by Devon were actually inserted into the AG's correspondence, although Pruitt's deputy later wrote “thanks for all your help on this.”
In two other emails dated May 1, 2013, a Devon Energy director replied with suggested changes to Pruitt's office. The next day, Pruitt's office sent the final draft of the letter to Devon, which replied, “I’m glad the Devon team could help, and thanks for all of your work on this.”
Deal provides financial succor to 3,500 Ohio Valley residents who said they were sickened by exposure to contaminated drinking water
Last week, chemical giant DuPont and its spin-off Chemours Co. announced they would pay up to $921 million to settle roughly 3,500 Ohio Valley lawsuits over illnesses linked to a toxic chemical known as C-8 used during the manufacture of Teflon.
C-8, also known as perfluorooctanoic acid or PFOA, is a soap-like powder that DuPont used for decades at its Washington Works plant in Parkersburg, WV, to smooth lumps in freshly-made Teflon. It's also dangerous, capable of causing cancers, pregnancy problems, and chronic health conditions like thyroid disease.
The hazards of C-8 were first revealed to the public as a result of legal battles waged by attorneys in this case since 1998. Internal DuPont documents uncovered during litigation showed that for decades, DuPont was aware the chemical was dangerous, escaping into the environment, and could be replaced — but that executives deliberately chose to keep using C-8 for years because it was cheaper than alternatives.
Over a span of decades, hundreds of thousands of pounds of C-8 was dumped by DuPont into the Ohio River, where it found its way into the drinking water of some 70,000 area residents.
"No settlement can restore the health of the thousands of victims of DuPont’s C-8," says Harold Bock, who lives close to the Washington Works plant and advises Keep Your Promises, a grassroots organization focused on C-8 exposure, "but we at Keep Your Promises are heartened to know that this long-awaited justice for these 3,550 members of our community is now within arm’s reach."
DuPont and Chemours agreed to each pay half of the overall settlement, which provides a total of $670.7 million in cash to the plaintiffs, plus up to $250 million in additional payouts over the next five years.
DuPont told investors in October that the lawsuits included roughly 30 wrongful death claims, 270 claims of kidney or testicular cancer, and over 1,300 claims of thyroid disease.
Both companies admitted no wrongdoing in the settlement agreement, but will pay expected damages of roughly $1.5 million to each plaintiff with cancer, attorneys in the case said, and lesser amounts to those with other conditions. The …more
Despite increasing evidence of climate impacts, state isn’t considering climate change for new dams and water storage projects that are in the works
As the skies continued to open up over the past few days and evacuations were being ordered in many parts of Northern California, like many others in this state, I couldn’t but wonder if other dams in California could run into the same kind of problems as Oroville dam in Butte County, where heavy rainfall during what’s turning out to be California’s wettest season on record, surpassed the dam’s capacity.
Photo by Photo by Cal OES
To recap: The 770-foot-tall dam, the nation’s tallest, ran into problems with both it’s main and emergency spillways, prompting the evacuation of nearly 200,000 people living in low-lying communities downstream on February 12. The dam’s water level has dropped since then and most people have returned home. But they have been told to remain vigilant given more rains are predicted for California this winter. Meanwhile, as of yesterday, numerous other reservoirs across the state are almost at capacity.
California has always alternated between periods of drought and extreme precipitation that can lead to massive flooding. But the key difference now is that climate change is intensifying the risk of floods and mudslides by inducing even more erratic and intense precipitation events. Can our state’s more than 1,400 dams withstand the pressure of these changing climate patterns? What needs to be done to ensure there aren’t similar problems as Oroville’s with other dams? What about the new dam projects or reservoir expansion projects that are being planned? Are they going to be climate ready?
To help shed some light on these questions I recently spoke with water experts Deborah Moore and Eric Wesselman. More was a commissioner with the World Commission on Dams, an international body that investigated the performance of dam projects across the world. She’s also a board member of International Rivers, an organization that works to protect rivers and the rights of communities that depend on them. Wesselman is executive director of Friends of the River, which works to protect and restore California Rivers by influencing public policy and inspiring citizen action. The main takeaway from our multiple conversations — over the phone and during Terra Verde, a radio show I co-host once a month — near-disasters (or worse) like Oroville are …more
Oxygen levels in oceans have fallen 2% in 50 years due to climate change, affecting marine habitat and large fish
The depletion of oxygen in our oceans threatens future fish stocks and risks altering the habitat and behavior of marine life, scientists have warned, after a new study found oceanic oxygen levels had fallen by 2 percent in 50 years.
The study, carried out at Geomar Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research in Germany, was the most comprehensive of the subject to date. The fall in oxygen levels has been attributed to global warming and the authors warn that if it continues unchecked, the amount of oxygen lost could reach up to 7% by 2100. Very few marine organisms are able to adapt to low levels of oxygen.
Photo by David/Flickr
The paper contains analysis of wide-ranging data from 1960 to 2010, documenting changes in oxygen distribution in the entire ocean for the first time. “Since large fish in particular avoid or do not survive in areas with low oxygen content, these changes can have far-reaching biological consequences,” said Dr Sunke Schmidtko, the report’s lead author.
Some areas have seen a greater drop than others. The Pacific – the planet’s largest ocean – has suffered the greatest volume of oxygen loss, while the Arctic witnessed the sharpest decline by percentage. “While the slight decrease of oxygen in the atmosphere is currently considered non-critical, the oxygen losses in the ocean can have far-reaching consequences because of the uneven distribution,” added another of the report’s authors, Lothar Stramma.
It is increasingly clear that the heaviest burden of climate change is falling on the planet’s oceans, which absorb more than 30 percent of the carbon produced on land. Rising sea levels are taking their toll on many of the world’s poorest places. Warming waters have devastated corals – including the Great Barrier Reef – in bleaching events.
Acidic oceans, caused by a drop in PH levels as carbon is absorbed, threaten creatures’ ability to build their calcium-based shells and other structures. Warming waters have also caused reproductive problems in species such as cod, and triggered their migration to colder climates. Lower oxygen levels in larger parts of the ocean are expected to force animals to seek out ever shrinking patches of habitable water, with significant impacts on the ecosystem …more
The biggest challenge facing the restoration process has been access to freshwater
Encouraging seabirds to recolonize regions of the Channel Islands National Park in California requires more than just erecting artificial nests and hoping they’ll return. They also need native island flora and the sweet serenade from their own species resonating above sheer, volcanic cliffs.
Photo by Chuck Graham
Since 2008, the National Park Service has been aggressively restoring lost habitat for seafaring birds like the nocturnal ashy storm petrels and the seafaring Cassin’s auklets on Santa Barbara Island, and on large rock outcroppings like Orizaba Rock, but especially on Scorpion Rock near the southeast end of Santa Cruz Island.
The project has been funded by the Montrose Restoration Program, which oversees the restoration of natural resources in southern California marine environment that were harmed by DDT and PCBs. From the late 1940s to the early 1970s, Montrose Chemical Corporation’s DDT manufacturing plant in Torrance, CA, dumped millions of tons of DDT-contaminated wastewater in the Southern California Bight near Catalina Island. The results were devastating for the pelagic food web. Ocean sediments in the region now contain the largest known concentration of DDT in the world.
In March 2001, following 25 years of litigation, Montrose and three other corporations — that were manufacturing PCBs and releasing their waste into the ocean through the same channels as Montrose — were ordered to pay $140 million in restitution with $40 million going towards restoring natural resources like seabird colonies on the Channel Islands National Park.
Photo by Chuck Graham
Twelve species of seabirds nest on the archipelago. Besides Cassin’s auklets and ashy storm petrels, the other 10 species include double-crested, pelagic, and Brandt’s cormorants, pigeon guillemots, Scripps’s murrelets, California brown pelicans, western gulls, black oystercatchers, and two more types of petrels, black and leach’s. Eight of those species utilize Scorpion Rock, which is nearing the end of a major facelift, botanically speaking.
At one time or another all five islands that make up the Channel Islands National Park experienced ranching, mainly between the 1830s and the late 1980s. When non-native animals are brought to islands non-native plants also come along. Perpetual northwest winds blew seeds onto the islands’ rock outcroppings, …more
Outbreak underscores gap between a wealthy elite and those who have fewer choices about where the can source their water from
A typhoid outbreak in Zimbabwe has been claiming lives and infecting dozens over the past few months. The outbreak, which is likely due to an over-stressed sewage system and lack of clean water, is widening the gap between a wealthy elite who can afford to import bottled water to escape disease and those who have fewer choices about where they bathe or how they quench their thirst.
Photo by Robert Allen
Typhoid — a serious bacterial infection that results from consuming contaminated water and food, or from close contact with someone who is infected — was first detected in Zimbabwe´s capital Harare in December 2016, when a 13-year-old girl succumbed to its complications.
The outbreak is the worst in Harare, the capital city 2 million where authorities have had to activate a typhoid treatment camp. As of early February, there have been two confirmed deaths, and more than 600 suspected cases, the majority in Harare and its adjacent suburbs.
The cause of the outbreak has been the subject of some dispute, but many experts agree that Harare’s over-stressed sewage system, with pipes designed in the 1960s and some last cleaned in the 90s, is a major part of the problem.
“Raw sewage finds itself flowing unchecked into household pipes because the system for transporting waste is not functioning,” says Jadagu Garikain, an academic at the University of Zimbabwe´s School of Rural and Urban Planning.
The need to upgrade the capital´s sewer system has remained unaddressed since the late 1980s. Given Harare’s growing population, the current infrastructure has outlived its lifespan. “The capital’s main sewer treatment plant can only treat 54 out of its required 154 mega liters per day,” Garikain adds. “Lack of electricity, engineers, [and] chemical agents is the fatal reason.”
Paired with the sewage problem is the issue of access to clean water — an emotionally fraught issue in Harare, one of Africa´s most water-stressed cities. Suburbs can endure three years without seeing a drop ooze out of pipes thanks to a severe shortage of cash to import purification chemicals, an exodus of qualified water engineers to South Africa, Australia and beyond, and, according to Transparency International Zimbabwe, a government accountability organization, illicit awarding of water contracts to dodgy water companies.
On luckier days, when there is water, …more
Federal agency has made 'no significant impact' determination for every pipeline-related climate assessment since 2009
Long before Trump spokeswoman Kellyanne Conway took the phrase “alternative facts” mainstream, a rogue federal agency with authority to ram giant gas pipelines through people’s property against their will has for years pioneered the Trumpian version of reality when assessing the climate impact of natural gas infrastructure.
Photo by Loozrboy, Flickr
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), an “independent” agency that regulates the interstate transmission of gas and electricity, has permitted nearly 200 interstate gas pipeline projects stretching over 6,000 miles since 2009, and rejected only a single application. For each of these permitted projects an environmental impact statement was conducted. Where climate was assessed in these studies, the conclusion has always been the same – “no significant impact.”
Oil Change International and partners are launching a series of briefings today, together with a detailed methodology, that set the record straight on FERC’s alternative climate facts. The evidence is as clear as the rain on Trump’s inauguration ceremony. Major interstate gas pipelines cause climate change.
We kick this series off with assessments of two proposed pipelines that would tear through the pristine national forests and historic bucolic farmlands of West Virginia and Virginia (and in the case of one, also through North Carolina), the Mountain Valley and Atlantic Coast pipelines. (Read more about the Atlantic Coast Pipeline’s impact on Appalachian landscapes and communities here.)
Together these pipelines would cause annual emissions of around 158 million metric tons, equivalent to that of 46 average coal plants or over 33 million passenger vehicles. These projects could deliver these emissions for decades to come, so given the urgency to reduce emissions to close to zero by mid-century to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, a verdict of ‘no significant impact’ seems a little lenient.
So how does FERC manage to portray these emissions as not actually happening? (Sean Spicer should take note here because we’re about to reveal some tricks of the trade.)
First, FERC sticks to long-since-discredited assumptions by ignoring an entire body of research that contradicts its preferred finding. Second, it pretends stuff that’s happening is not happening.
The discredited assumption FERC is wedded to is the idea that gas is a cleaner fossil fuel than coal or oil and therefore more gas flowing …more