US Dolphin Safe Tuna Label is Unfair to Mexico, WTO rules yet again

Marine mammal advocates accuse trade body of putting business above dolphin protection

If Mexico and the World Trade Organization have their way, those “dolphin safe” cans of tuna you’ve been buying at the supermarket might actually come stained with dolphin blood.

Last Friday, the global trade body again ruled against the United States in a long-running dispute with Mexico over US “Dolphin Safe” tuna-labeling regulations, saying that the regulations unfairly discriminate against Mexico. The decision by the WTO’s appellate body is the latest development in a trade dispute between the two countries that dates back to the establishment of the Dolphin Safe tuna label in 1990.

tuna cansPhoto by The Hamster Factor/FlickrThe dolphin-safe label (the small oval yellow logo on these cans) has helped save countless dolphins since it was established in the 1990s.

“While we are disappointed with the Appellate Body’s findings, this need not be the end of the road for dolphin-safe labeling,” Kitty Block, vice president of Humane Society International said in a statement. Block says animal advocates will urge US trade officials to work with Mexico to figure out a solution that wouldn’t jeopardize dolphins.

The dolphin-safe label has helped save countless dolphins in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean (ETPO) — a large marine region running from Southern California to Peru and extending out into the Pacific Ocean almost to Hawai’i — where schools of tuna tend to swim along with dolphins. Mexico and several other countries allow their tuna industry to deliberately target, chase, and surround the dolphins with nets in order to get to the tuna. More than 7 million dolphins have died after being trapped in nets since this fishing method was introduced in 1957.

In 1990, after years of campaigning by Earth Island Institute’s International Marine Mammal Project, the Dolphin Safe tuna label was established in the US. The label can only be used for tuna that is not caught by chasing and netting dolphins. It also can’t be used if dolphins are killed or seriously injured during a tuna fishing expedition. According to IMMP, since the label was established, dolphin deaths from tuna fishing have declined 98 percent. Currently, only Mexican, Venezuelan, and Colombian tuna vessels are still chasing and netting dolphins.

Mexico has objected to this labeling for years, claiming these restrictions to protect dolphins — which until recently only applied to tuna fishing in the ETPO region — discriminate against the Mexican tuna industry. In 2008 it took its complaint to the WTO. Following years of arguing back and forth, in 2014, the US National Marine Fisheries Service extended the restrictions to tuna fisheries from all parts of the world.

Friday’s ruling is the last the trade body is going to make in this dispute and could lead to Mexico making a claim for retaliation against US exports if it believes the United States has not brought its rules into line with the WTO ruling.

Marine mammal advocates say the ruling shows that the WTO continues to put business above dolphin protection.

“Time and time again the WTO has shown it doesn’t care about wildlife, the environment or truth in labeling,” says David Phillips, director of the Earth Island Institute’s International Marine Mammal Project, which now monitors tuna companies around the world for compliance. Phillips believes that the decision in only going to result in “a lot of arm-waving” and “see we are right” comments from Mexico, but it’s not gong to change anything.

For one, Mexico will now also have to try and establish the value of the tuna trade they are not able to bring into the US because of the labeling restriction. “We say the value is zero because nobody here wants your tuna,” Phillips says. “US canning companies, retailers, and consumers do not want tuna that’s caught harming dolphins.”

For more information on Dolphin Safe tuna: http://www.dolphinsafetuna.com

Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

You Make Our Work Possible

You Make Our Work Possible

We don’t have a paywall because, as a nonprofit publication, our mission is to inform, educate and inspire action to protect our living world. Which is why we rely on readers like you for support. If you believe in the work we do, please consider making a tax-deductible year-end donation to our Green Journalism Fund.

Donate
Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

The Latest

The Shocking Truth About Sloths

As their forests disappear, sloths are climbing on dangerous power lines. Veterinarians and rescue centers are developing new techniques to help.

Madeline Bodin

Australian Gas Project Threatens Aboriginal Heritage

Activists worry a Scarborough gas field project could destroy petroglyphs while hurting climate goals.

Campbell Young

Bats of the Midnight Sun

Active in daylight during the Arctic summer and hibernating during the long winter nights, Alaska’s little brown bats are a unique population. Can their niche lives help them avoid white-nose syndrome?

Words Trina Moyles Images Michael Code

Land and Love in Melbourne

An Australian referendum to provide a political voice for First Peoples may have failed, but the push will continue.

Alda Balthrop-Lewis

A Canadian Corporation is Poisoning My Argentinian Community

We, the people of Jáchal, are fighting for the right to safe and clean water.

Saúl Zeballos

Climate Comedy Works. Here’s Why.

We all need some refreshing levity nowadays – especially during this politically heavy year.

Maxwell Boykoff Beth Osnes