Get a FREE Issue of Earth Island Journal
Sign up for our no-risk offer today.

Go Back: Home > Earth Island Journal > Latest News > Post and Comments

Latest News

Proposed California Fracking Regulations Friendly to the Industry, Not the Public

Short public comment window ends January 15

On November 15, the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR), released its proposed regulations for fracking and other types of well stimulation, as stipulated by SB4.  The regulations are the first in California to regulate fracking and acidizing.

natural gas rig at night Photo by Tim EvansonThe regulations fail to address some of the most pressing concerns that will come
from fracking and acidizing — decreased air quality, and increased greenhouse
emissions from climate change.

Although hailed by regulators and the oil industry as the toughest regulations in the country, they are not. Far from perfect, the regs leave much to be desired in the way of public health and environmental protection.

The proposed regulations do have some steps that move California in the right direction. For example, they:

- Require a permit for the first time in California.

- Mandates disclosure of all chemicals used in the fracking and acidizing process. If a trade secret exemption is claimed, the information will still be available to state officials, emergency responders, and health professionals.

 - Require a notice that a fracking job will occur to all property owners and tenant 30 days prior to the start of the project.

 - Provides water monitoring, before and after the project, to be paid for by the operator of the well.

- Require well operators to report any seismic events that measure 2.0 magnitude or above.

Unfortunately, the proposed regulations are also loaded with giveaways for the oil industry. In many aspects, it seems that DOGGR has done the minimum required by SB4, and ignores the needs of the environment, and the rights of the Californians. Additionally, the regulations fail to address some of the most pressing concerns that will come from fracking and acidizing Decreased air quality, and increased greenhouse emissions from climate change.

Regulations based on science, that put the needs of Californians above those of corporate profits, will help protect people and the environment. The proposed regulations do not do this, and have written in ways that circumvent existing California law. For example:

 Definitions, as written, regarding well stimulation, particularly acidizing, do not conform to accepted definitions used in previous reports, research, and data.  DOGGR seems to be attempting to redefine the procedures so regulations don’t apply to some types of well stimulation.

 Permits would not be required to acidizing jobs where the concentration of acid is less than 7 percent. There is no basis or explanation as to why this percentage was chosen.

 Definitions of “protected waters” in the regulations do no conform to standard definitions used in California regulations governing water, and followed by Water Control Boards.

 The current DOGGR regulations require that tenants have a written contract to receive notification. This directly contradicts California regulations, which state that tenants do not need to have written contract of occupancy in order to be considered tenants. Many tenants in rural and minority areas do not have a written contract with their landlords.

 The regulations do not require a CEQA review to be conducted for each well.  CEQA allows for public input. Once a permit is issued, there is no way for the public to have any input or be able to stop fracking from happening in their neighborhoods.

The public will have 60 days to comment on the proposed regulations before they go into effect. During that time, several public meetings will be held throughout the state, including:

Sacramento: January 6, Sierra Room, California Environmental Protection Agency Building, 10th & I streets, 3-7 p.m.
Long Beach: January 6, California State University-Long Beach Auditorium, 1212 Bellflower Boulevard, 3-7 p.m.
Bakersfield: January 8, Kern County Administrative Center, first floor board chambers, 1115 Truxtun Avenue, 3-7 p.m.
Salinas: January 8, National Steinbeck Center, One Main Street, 3-7 p.m.
Santa Maria: January 13, Santa Barbara County Supervisors Hearing Room, 511 East Lakeside Parkway, 3-7 p.m. 

A written request by Earthworks and partners, as well as the office of Senator Pavley — the main author of SB4 — for an extension on the public comment period due to the holidays, was denied by DOGGR with no explanation. Any member of the public wishing to submit comments must do so by January 15, 2014.

The major inefficiencies in the proposed regulations must be corrected before they can be put into effect. The role of state agencies is to protect the public, not the oil industry. The public must be involved at all stages of development, allowing for transparency and legitimacy in the process.

Comments can be submitted via email to DOGGRRegulations@conservation.ca.gov; via FAX to (916) 324-0948; or via regular mail to:
Attention: Well Stimulation Regulations.
The Department of Conservation Office of Governmental and Environmental Relations,
801 K Street MS 24-02, 95814,
Sacramento, CA  95814

 

Email this post to a friend.

Write to the editor about this post.

Subscribe Today
cover thumbnail EIJ cover thumbnail EIJ cover thumbnail EIJ cover thumbnail EIJFour issues of the award-winning
Earth Island Journal for only $10

 

Comments

The email listed herein to provide public comment is invalid.  :(

By Saunie Holloway on Fri, November 22, 2013 at 4:57 pm

Leave a comment

Comments Policy

Remember my personal information?

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

View Posts by Date View Posts by Author

Subscribe
Today

Four issues for just
$10 a year.

cover thumbnail EIJ

Join Now!

 
get tickets to the 15th annual Brower Youth Awards!

0.1294