Leap Manifesto Calls for Radical Changes to Canada’s Extractive Economy

Campaign envisions building a sustainable energy economy over next 20 years

The Leap Manifesto: A Call for a Canada Based on Caring for the Earth and One Another is signed by over 50 organizations including Oxfam, Idle No More, CUPE, CLC, PSAC, Council of Canadians, Greenpeace, 350.org and over 100 individual signatories of scientists, economists, artists, and activists.

ariel view of the Tar Sands minePhoto by thekirbster/FlickrThe manifesto, launched at a news conference in Toronto on Tuesday, lays out an ambitious plan to move away from extereme energy projects like Alberta’s tar sands, end fossil fuel subsidies, increase income taxes on corporations and the wealthy, cut military spending and implement a progressive carbon tax.

The manifesto warns that: “climate scientists have told us that this is the decade to take decisive action to prevent catastrophic global warming. That means small steps will no longer get us where we need to go.”

“So we need to leap!”

One of the manifesto’s central demands is 100 per cent renewable energy by 2035 and a 100 per cent clean economy by 2050.

“If any politicians don’t support that demand then they have to explain why,” said Naomi Klein, author of This Changes Everything. “If the scientists are telling us that we have to do it, and the engineers are telling us that we can do it, then why are our politicians setting targets that are way off in the future?”

The manifesto, which was hashed out over two days of meetings with 60 activists in May, is wide-ranging, with a series of radical demands such as:

  • Fully implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
  • A “100 per cent clean economy by 2050.”
  • A halt to new infrastructure projects such as oil and gas pipelines, fracking projects in New Brunswick, British Columbia and Quebec, increased tanker traffic off the coasts and Canadian mining companies operations around the world.
  • The creation of “innovative ownership structures [that are] democratically run, paying living wages and keeping much-needed revenue in communities.”
  • A universal program to build energy efficient homes, and retrofit existing housing.
  • Retraining for workers in “carbon-intensive jobs.”
  • Investment in public infrastructure that can better withstand extreme weather.
  • An end to all trade deals “that interfere with our attempts to rebuild local economies, regulate corporations and stop damaging extractive projects.”
  • Welcoming “many more refugees and migrants seeking safety and a better life.”
  • A national child-care program, similar to the one the province of Quebec has.
  • A universal annual income.

The signatories are planning to use the document to spark discussions and hold town-hall meetings through the fall and winter with the possibility of a “Leap Year” campaign in 2016.

Poet George Elliot Clarke didn’t pull any punches when speaking at the meeting calling it “an apocalyptic moment for the planet.”

“We have driven this entire planet to the brink of massive catastrophes that are definitely going to ruin everybody’s bank accounts,” said Clarke. “So there’s definitely an economic imperative for moving us away from extremely destructive environmental exploitation in the name of supposed development. We have seen the wreckage and the ruin and in some cases the genocidal results of this kind of so-called development that is in fact destruction.”

Can we afford to pay for of all of this? Three senior staff from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA), Bruce Campbell, Seth Klein and Marc Lee say, in short, the answer is “yes.”

The CCPA points to their Alternative Federal budget which calls for an end to subsidies to the fossil fuel industry, a new financial transaction tax, higher royalties for natural resource extraction, increasing corporate taxes and getting rid of other tax exemptions, cutting the military to pre-9/11 levels, eliminating income-splitting and tax cuts for families with children, and a $30 per ton carbon tax.

Seth Klein estimates these changes could generate an additional $50 billion a year for spending by the federal government and increase government spending an additional 2.5 per cent of Canada’s GDP bringing it to a total of 15 per cent of GDP.

Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

You Make Our Work Possible

You Make Our Work Possible

We don’t have a paywall because, as a nonprofit publication, our mission is to inform, educate and inspire action to protect our living world. Which is why we rely on readers like you for support. If you believe in the work we do, please consider making a tax-deductible year-end donation to our Green Journalism Fund.

Donate
Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

The Latest

The Shocking Truth About Sloths

As their forests disappear, sloths are climbing on dangerous power lines. Veterinarians and rescue centers are developing new techniques to help.

Madeline Bodin

Australian Gas Project Threatens Aboriginal Heritage

Activists worry a Scarborough gas field project could destroy petroglyphs while hurting climate goals.

Campbell Young

Bats of the Midnight Sun

Active in daylight during the Arctic summer and hibernating during the long winter nights, Alaska’s little brown bats are a unique population. Can their niche lives help them avoid white-nose syndrome?

Words Trina Moyles Images Michael Code

Land and Love in Melbourne

An Australian referendum to provide a political voice for First Peoples may have failed, but the push will continue.

Alda Balthrop-Lewis

A Canadian Corporation is Poisoning My Argentinian Community

We, the people of Jáchal, are fighting for the right to safe and clean water.

Saúl Zeballos

Climate Comedy Works. Here’s Why.

We all need some refreshing levity nowadays – especially during this politically heavy year.

Maxwell Boykoff Beth Osnes