Get a FREE Issue of Earth Island Journal
Sign up for our no-risk offer today.

Go Back: Home > Earth Island Journal > Latest News > Post and Comments

Latest News

If Natural Gas Is Bad for Coal, Is It Good for Us?

Natural Gas DrillingEver since reading Adam Federman's cover story on natural gas drilling in the Northeast (Spring 2010), I've been mildly obsessed with natural gas, particularly shale gas, which is reached via a controversial drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing. Hydraulic facturing, "fracking" for short, has been around for decades, but when combined with new horizontal drilling techniques, it's suddenly made shale gas financially viable. There's a ton of shale gas in the U.S. (or several trillion cubic feet to be exact), and the fact that we can now get to it has driven the price of natural gas down. That's sparked a global shale gas rush, which I've been reporting on a lot lately.

As with most things, the more I know, the more obvious it is to me that there's no one perfect answer to the question of whether the environmental impacts of fracking are worth dealing with in order to get to a cleaner-burning fossil fuel. A recent report by Deutschebank only makes the decision tougher. The report essentially states that as global natural gas prices are converging, the price for natural gas is going lower than the price of coal in many of the world's top energy-consuming nations. In the United States, in particular, it's the low price of natural gas--not the threat of climate legislation or a price on carbon--that may finally unseat King Coal.

That conclusion was backed up by a conversation I had recently with Bill Massey, lead counsel for the Compete Coalition, a group of energy producers and utilities advocating for competitive energy market in the U.S., and the former FERC commissioner responsible for much of the build-out of natural gas infrastructure in the United States. According to Massey, at the moment natural gas prices are currently dictating the price for power in the United States. And right now that price is cheap. “Shale gas has just burst on the scene over the last couple of years, and if you look at the price strips going out they’re heavily affected by expectation of shale gas production,” Massey said. “We’ve seen major price reductions in the last two years, up to 40 percent in some regions.”

Cheap natural gas would seem like a clear positive; few dispute the fact that both getting at and burning natural gas produces fewer emissions than getting at and burning coal. The trouble is, with so much natural gas available, will investors and politicians lose their appetite for renewable energy projects? More over, how do you do a cost-benefit analysis on lower carbon emissions versus contaminated water sources (fracking has been linked to water and air toxics)? And if, as many are hoping, the EPA begins to regulate hydraulic fracturing and the price of natural gas goes up, will we be back to square one with coal?

We'll be tackling this very subject in our next Plus/Minus column. As the natural gas industry continues to develop over the course of the next few years, the answers to these and other questions will become clearer. Whether we like those answers remains to be seen.

 

 

Amy Westervelt, Journalist
The former Managing Editor of the Journal, Amy is associate editor for The Faster Times and This Week in Earth, a columnist for Forbes, and contributes to an assortment of other magazines and websites. In 2007, Amy won the Folio Eddie for excellence in magazine editorial for her feature on algae as a feedstock for biofuel, which was published in Sustainable Industries magazine.

Email this post to a friend.

Write to the editor about this post.

Subscribe Today
cover thumbnail EIJ cover thumbnail EIJ cover thumbnail EIJ cover thumbnail EIJFour issues of the award-winning
Earth Island Journal for only $10

 

Comments

“Assessment of the Greenhouse Gas Footprint of Natural Gas from Shale Formations Obtained by High-Volume, Slick-Water Hydraulic Fracturing: “...We urge caution in viewing natural gas as good fuel choice for the future. Using the best available science, we conclude that natural gas is no better than coal and may in fact be worse than coal in terms of its greenhouse gas footprint when evaluated over the time course of the next several decades…” ” (Cornell University)- http://www.eeb.cornell.edu/howarth/GHG emissions from Marcellus—November 2010.pdf

By Brendan on Fri, November 26, 2010 at 4:03 pm

Leave a comment

Comments Policy

Remember my personal information?

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

View Posts by Date View Posts by Author

Subscribe
Today

Four issues for just
$10 a year.

cover thumbnail EIJ

Join Now!

 
Go Solar with Earth Island Institute!

0.1217