Earth Island Institute logo, tap or click to visit the Institute home page

Go Back: Home > Earth Island Journal > Latest News > Post and Comments

Latest News

California’s Disappearing Dream

How the drought, hotter temperatures, and a booming population continue to shape the Golden State’s environmental future

This story was produced as part of the Letters to the Future project.

The highest mountains in the West run north-to-south through the Mediterranean latitudes and just 150 miles from the Pacific Ocean – a remarkable stroke of geologic luck that has made California one of the richest ecological and agricultural regions on the continent. These mountains accumulate deep snow in the winter, which in turn feeds cold rivers that flow through the hot, dry months.

photo of an arid landscapephoto by Gordon / FlickrCalifornia is entering its sixth year of drought. Research indicates that the drought has been made worse by climate change.

But the unique conditions that California’s native fish, its farms and its cities depend on are acutely threatened by climate change. In 2015, virtually no snow fell in the Sierra Nevada.

Droughts occur naturally, but research indicates the current drought in the American West has been made worse by climate change and that future droughts will be exacerbated by the warming planet. A 2015 paper published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters calculated that climate change has made California’s current drought as much as 27 percent worse than it would otherwise have been. In 2015, Stanford researchers, led by associate professor of earth sciences Noah Diffenbaugh, predicted that extremely hot years in California will increasingly overlap with dry spells in the future. Greenhouse gases, the scientists reported, are pushing this trend. Diffenbaugh explained to The New York Times that, even if precipitation remains ample, warmer winters in the future will mean less water stored away as snow – historically the most important reservoir in the state.

As water supplies shrink, the human population is booming. By 2050, the agencies that manage and distribute California’s water will be answering to the needs of roughly 50 million people as well as the state’s enormous agriculture industry. Current squabbles over California’s water will escalate into blistering fights, and native salmon – once the main protein source for the West Coast’s indigenous people – will probably vanish in the fray as the Sacramento and San Joaquin river system is tapped to the max for human needs. Other native fishes, too, like green sturgeon, will almost certainly dwindle or disappear. 

The atmospheric buildup of greenhouse gases will manifest in other ways, too. Disruption of ocean currents could reduce the upwelling of cold bottom water so critical for California’s coastal ecosystem. California’s shoreline will erode as sea level rises, threatening coastal real estate, roads, and public space. In 2009, the Pacific Institute released a report predicting that a 100-year flood combined with a 5-foot rise in sea level could cause more than $100 billion in damage, most of it in the Bay Area.

Californians are as much to blame for climate change as nearly any other comparable economy. In 2013, California generated 350 million metric tons of carbon dioxide pollution – more than every other state except Texas, which emitted more than 600 million. Most of California’s emissions came from burning petroleum, and more than half could be linked directly to transportation – mostly private vehicles. Globally, the United States’ 324 million residents generate more carbon dioxide from fossil fuels than every other nation but China. Even all the nations of the European Union emit just 60 percent as much CO2 as Americans do in spite of outnumbering Americans by almost 200 million. 

California has responded to the alarms of climate researchers with aggressive emissions goals. Assembly Bill 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, called for reducing greenhouse gas emissions rates to 1990 levels by 2020. More recently, the California Assembly passed Senate Bill 32, which extends some of the targets of AB32 to 2030, at which point the new law requires California to be emitting 40 percent less greenhouse gases than it was in 1990. 

These goals will likely prompt shifts to renewable energy and sustainable agriculture, a carbon fee, more walking and cycling in place of driving, and adoption of clean energy. If other governments follow suit, rates of global warming could be slowed or stopped. If business continues as usual, though, Californians will reap what we sow.

Alastair Bland
Alastair Bland is a freelance journalist in San Francisco, California. He writes about water, fisheries, agriculture and the environment, and his work has appeared at,, the Sacramento News and Review and Yale E360.

Email this post to a friend.

Write to the editor about this post.

Subscribe Today
cover thumbnail EIJ cover thumbnail EIJ cover thumbnail EIJ cover thumbnail EIJFour issues of the award-winning
Earth Island Journal for only $15



How is it possible that the Earth had huge swings in temperature and precipitation in the past millions of years. Guess what it did this without humans driving cars. Love how they blame people driving cars. I drive a V8 to work then I get in my dual engine diesel scraper and run it 8 hours billowing black suit clouds in the sky and I don’t care I actually enjoy seeing the look on snowflake faces as they drive by thinking that should be illegal or regulated heavily. Earth Cycles

By Woodsmen on Sat, December 23, 2017 at 10:19 am

greg coker -  same problem different place . a train - all electric - “save”  in petro by-products .  Pogue   (1930)  - looked up his patent -  its a goid-awful mess   ,  compared to microelectronics -  principle the same -  been mentioned in films , articles and “Suppressed Inventions”.  200 miles to the gallon -  politicians and “”“management”“”  wanted volume sales - thus then 10%  efficiency “acceptable”  diesel got annoyed got it to 25%

By D.R. Jones on Tue, August 01, 2017 at 4:06 pm

Have you ever seen the enviromental problems in Mexico, China, and Russia? Maybe that’s where you should start with the world is ending due to “Global Warming.” Are there plans for a coweletic converter? Just shove it in a little below the tail and…no more cow farts ruining our clean air. California is a drought state. We need more dams not a high speed train that costs billions of dollars. It’s typical that ouri liberal state government thinks so highly of itself that it can change the weather. It might be global warming but maybe, just maybe it’s a natural cycle…from nature…which can’t be controlled. P.S. Starting in 2020 the next ice age is coming…

By Greg Coker on Sun, July 30, 2017 at 2:51 am


A year ago this story predicted that California’s drought would not end any time soon.

One year later, we have all-time record water content in the snowpack, more than 200% of “normal,” the most in record over 140 years.

By Raymond Kraft on Fri, April 21, 2017 at 5:35 am

Climate charlatans lead the suicidal march to the zero carbon footprint.

By L.Vaserstein on Wed, March 15, 2017 at 4:23 am

Vehicles convert 10%  of petroleum to moving energy -  diesel got it to 25%  .  Converting other   90%  as moving energy   -  which will never happen govs like the taxes -  CO2 emmissions could   drop - but that will not happen

By D. R. Jones on Fri, March 10, 2017 at 3:29 pm

Hmmm….So let me get this right.  Current climate models predicted drought in 2016 in California.  Do the same models predict the current record rainfalls in the state in 2017? 

Is anyone every held responsible for failed predictions of their models?

By Todd on Mon, February 20, 2017 at 3:57 pm

Leave a comment

Comments Policy

Remember my personal information?

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

View Posts by Date View Posts by Author


Four issues for just
$15 a year.

cover thumbnail EIJ

Join Now!