Advocates Win Key Victories to Stop Wildlife-Killing Contests in the US

Statewide ban in California and victories in Idaho and Oregon spur hope for nationwide predator management reform

Wildlife-killing contests in the United States go by many different names, including wildlife derbies, predator-hunting contests, coyote calling contests, and coyote drives. But whatever the name, and wherever they are held, these contests come down to the same basic principle: Hunting animals for entertainment, with prizes for the top killers.

Coyotephoto byShawn McCready, on FlickrPrizes and inducements can no longer be awarded for nongame wildlife-killing contests in California.

Recently, the prize-for-killing mentality has come under increasing scrutiny, and in early December, wildlife activists won a key victory when the California Fish and Game Commission announced that “prizes and inducements” can no longer be awarded for nongame wildlife-killing contests in the state. The policy change makes California the first state to enact such a ban.

The California prohibition follows a nearly two-year effort by environmental advocates to reform the commission’s predator management policy. The campaign honed in on one particular wildlife-killing contest in northern California, known as the Modoc Coyote Drive, raising concerns not only for public safety and ethics, but also for the safety of OR-7, the first wolf to show up in California in 87 years, who was traversing in the region at the time.

Pointing out that OR-7 was protected under the federal Endangered Species Act, environmental groups, including Project Coyote, an Earth Island Institute project that works to change negative perceptions about predator species, petitioned the commission not only to stop the Modoc County killing contest, but also to ban nongame wildlife-killing contests statewide. During the rule-making process, the commission received thousands of letters and petitions in support of the ban, and on December 3, it voted 4 to 1 to end such contests in California.

“Awarding prizes for wildlife-killing contests is both unethical and inconsistent with our modern understanding of natural systems,” Michael Sutton, president of the commission, said after the vote. “Such contests are an anachronism and have no place in modern wildlife management.” It isn’t yet clear when the ban will be implemented.

The victory in California follows closely on the heels of another win in Idaho, this one involving a wolf and coyote-hunting contest on public lands managed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Seven conservation groups, including Project Coyote, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Western Environmental Law Center, filed two separate lawsuits against the federal agencies last year to stop the hunt. In November, the BLM revoked the permit for the predator-killing contest. “Our hope with that decision by the BLM is that it will set a precedent for the nation for contests on BLM land,” says Camilla Fox, founder of Project Coyote.

Despite the BLM’s change of heart, the contest is still scheduled to take place on USFS land in January 2015. And the event sponsor, ironically named Idaho for Wildlife, is standing by the hunt, extolling the predator management benefits for ranchers. “Does this mean that Idaho For Wildlife can tell hunters not to travel and hunt on BLM land?” Idaho For Wildlife asks on its website. “Absolutely not! All this means is that any predators taken on BLM land during the contest period cannot be entered into the competitive hunting event to win prizes or cash.”

“We believe that both the forest service and the BLM have an obligation to take a closer look at these events from a public interest standpoint and make sure these are the kinds of events that are appropriate on our public lands,” says Laura King, an attorney with the Western Environmental Law Center. “We don’t’ think that they are appropriate on our public lands. We think that they are disrespectful to wildlife, we think they are a hazard from a public safety standpoint, and we really think that the federal government needs to take a close look at those issues, as well as at the broader issue of wolf recovery and respect for predators on the landscape.”

In a third victory for wildlife advocates this year, Project Coyote and the Animal Legal Defense Fund enjoyed a win in Oregon in June, successfully challenging what Fox called “one of the largest coyote kill fests in Oregon” under the state’s gambling laws.

Project CoyoteCalifornia Fish and Game Commission President Mike Sutton and Project Coyote Executive Director Camilla Fox discuss the recent ruling to ban wildlife killing contests in the state.

Despite this winning streak, there is still a long way to go when it comes to stopping wildlife-killing contests and reforming predator management policy in the United States. So far, Project Coyote has identified hundreds of wildlife-killing derbies targeting coyotes, bobcats, foxes, crows, ravens, marmots, and prairie dogs, among other species, across the country. The organization believes that thousands of such contests take place every year. The species targeted in these hunts, which are classified as non-game animals, are typically left unmonitored and unprotected by the states, making them especially vulnerable to ranchers and hunters.

But advocates aren’t giving up. “I think like dog fighting and cockfighting, we are going to see a ban on this immoral, unethical, ecologically unsound practice,” says Fox. “And my hope is that in my generation we see that nationwide ban.”

Visit Project Coyote’s website to take action on predator management reform.

Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

You Make Our Work Possible

You Make Our Work Possible

We don’t have a paywall because, as a nonprofit publication, our mission is to inform, educate and inspire action to protect our living world. Which is why we rely on readers like you for support. If you believe in the work we do, please consider making a tax-deductible year-end donation to our Green Journalism Fund.

Donate
Get the Journal in your inbox.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

The Latest

Land and Love in Melbourne

An Australian referendum to provide a political voice for First Peoples may have failed, but the push will continue.

Alda Balthrop-Lewis

A Canadian Corporation is Poisoning My Argentinian Community

We, the people of Jáchal, are fighting for the right to safe and clean water.

Saúl Zeballos

Climate Comedy Works. Here’s Why.

We all need some refreshing levity nowadays – especially during this politically heavy year.

Maxwell Boykoff Beth Osnes

Court Halts US Effort to Monitor Crypto Mining Energy Use

New requirement would cause 'irreparable injury' to industry amid surging electricity usage, federal judge rules.

Oliver Milman The Guardian

Saving the Bears of Abruzzo

In Italy, efforts to build a viable population of Marsican brown bears are underway.

Monique Gadella

River Guardians

Grassroots groups have taken it upon themselves to protect waterways in the southeastern US — and elsewhere around the world.

Melba Newsome Photographs by Madeline Gray