We can and must ensure equitable access to national parks while also investing in public lands infrastructure
My circle of professional friends and colleagues is abuzz with the recent announcement of the proposed National Park Service fee hikes that would increase the entry fees at 17 national parks, in some cases almost tripling the cost of a visit. Many have been interviewed and quoted for a variety of articles and news stories, which you can find here and here, and which I recommend you read. Nonetheless our quotes are brief snapshots of conversations we have been having for years about equitable access to our public lands – and this proposed fee hike serves only as a reminder that we must look at the landscape of this issue beyond the headline.
photo by Joe Jiang / Flickr
It is easy to stake positions on whether the fee hike is needed or not – the NPS says it will help address a maintenance backlog – and whether it will make access more difficult for communities that already have a lack of access to our national parks. To me, it takes a little more work to tease out the nuance and context necessary to understand why it is important to both invest in our public lands infrastructure and to ensure we have equitable access to parks, particularly as our nation’s demographics continue to shift with more diverse ethnic and cultural representation. Balancing these interests is imperative for the wellbeing of our public lands and our communities. Presenting the issue as an either/or conversation or a zero-sum game ensures we won’t move forward on this issue. We have seen this before in the environmental space when we frame a conversation of “economy vs. environment” or “jobs vs. conservation” for communities of color – especially when we know it is possible to have both.
First a few things I want state clearly:
- Yes, we need to “fix our parks.” There has been an infrastructure maintenance backlog for years.
- The physical and social infrastructure of our national parks will need to continue to change to reflect changing demographics – for example, creating picnic sites that can accommodate larger families than the typical nuclear family model, and of course including signage in other languages.
- There is a real history of communities of color being excluded …more
Glitter may be festive, but like other microplastics, it's a nightmare for human and animal health
All that glitters ain’t gold, or so the old adage goes. And when it comes to the glitter used in everyday cosmetics, specialty make-up, hair products and party paraphernalia, the negative effects on human health and the environment are indeed far from golden.
“They really do get into everything, and despite their tiny size, they can have a devastating impact on humans and non-human animals,” wrote Trisia Farrelly, a social anthropologist at Massey University in New Zealand and an expert in waste plastics, in an email to AlterNet.
Glitter is one member of a large family of microplastics – tiny little bits of plastic less than five millimeters in size. Think microbeads, microfibers, and fingernail-sized fragments of much larger plastic wastes that have broken down over time. When washed or flushed away, microplastics make their way into our oceans and great lakes, slowly accumulating over time, creating all sorts of health and environmental hazards, the full breadth of which is still being grasped.
For one, there’s the issue of how microplastics like cosmetic glitter – made by bonding aluminum with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) – impact sensitive ecosystems. That’s because PETs leach out endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which, when eaten by marine life, can cause adverse developmental, reproductive, neurological, and immune effects, said Farrelly. In this recent study, microplastics are shown to significantly impact the reproduction rates of oysters.
Then there’s the domino-like effect of microplastics through the food-chain, for the sheer volume of microplastics consumed by seafood-loving humans is staggering. This study from the University of Ghent found that Europeans who eat shellfish can consume as much as 11,000 microplastics per year. But what are some of the long-term implications from glitter passing through the food-chain?
PETs attract and absorb persistent organic pollutants and pathogens, adding an extra layer of contamination. When those at the bottom of the ladder – like molluscs, sea snails, marine worms, and plankton – eat pathogen or pollutant-carrying particles of glitter, these minuscule poison pills can concentrate in toxicity as they move up the food chain, all the way to our dinner plates, said Farrelly.
“When we eat Kai moana [Maori term for seafood], we are taking on these toxins,” she wrote. “When they enter the gut, the toxins and pathogens are very easily taken up.”
A growing body of research …more
Can California rebuild with a better plan for the fires that will come again?
The 2017 Northern California wildfires, which have damaged or destroyed over 8,000 homes and buildings, scorched more than 200,000 acres, displaced 100,000 and killed at least 42 people, are, as Governor Jerry Brown put it: “one of the greatest tragedies California has ever faced.”
Photo by tonynetone/Flickr
The scale of this human tragedy is unprecedented but not inexplicable given the increasing number of homes that are being built next to wilderness areas. California is the third-largest state in the country but it’s also heavily populated. Many homes here are situated at what’s called the “wildland-urban interface” — areas where natural landscapes and manmade structure meet, making it easy for wildfires to spread into suburban and ex-urban communities.
What’s more, our changing weather patterns are likely to make such fires more frequent. As Climatewire reported, global warming will make vegetation drier, increase the chance of lightning strikes, extend the warmer seasons and even intensify winds such as the Diablo winds — the dry, nearly hurricane-force winds (also called Santa Ana and Sundowner) that blow from the interior towards the California Bay Area coast during fall. All of these are triggers for wildfires, which have long been a natural part of the California landscape.
Now, with massive re-construction looming after devastating losses, can California re-build with a better plan for the fires that will come again?
Chad Hanson, a forest ecologist who specializes in wildfires in the American West is clear in his response: It's an enormous mistake to simply rebuild without real introspection. "We have always had fires, even big fires," says Hanson, who is also the director of Earth Island Institute’s John Muir Project. "These ecosystems need fire, and we have a lot of people living in areas where fires must occur."
In other words, there's a reason that fire is one of nature’s key elements. To accept fire's necessary role in the ecosystem, it has to be thought of as necessary as wind or rain. That's not to say that immense fires should be allowed to run rampant; rather, Hanson proposes three key steps to help prevent the massive infrastructure destruction of the recent Northern California fires: create a defensible space around homes, make …more
The battle for Mosul has left the city shrouded in smog
The smoke that billowed from the burning oil fields was so thick it blocked out the sun. By the time I reached Qayyarah, where Islamic State fighters had set fire to 19 oil wells, a film of black soot had settled over the Iraqi town like toxic snow. Even the sheep had turned black.
Photo by NASA
Pools of thick oil ran in the streets. In the sky above the town, the black smog mixed with white fumes from a nearby sulphur plant that the jihadists had also set on fire as they retreated. The plant burned for months, spewing as much sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere as a small volcanic eruption. Hundreds of people were hospitalized.
The fires may have been extinguished, and Isis ousted from the city, but the environmental devastation caused by the battle for Mosul will linger for decades. The destruction of hospitals, weapons factories, industrial plants and power stations has left behind a toxic cocktail of chemicals, heavy metals and other harmful waste. Many of these pollutants are mixed up with unexploded bombs and mines in the vast amount of rubble generated by the fighting.
Our team has already found high levels of lead and mercury in Mosul’s water and soil. This is the toxic legacy of one of the fiercest urban battles of the modern age.
When we measure the brutality of war, we often count the dead bodies, the destroyed homes and the lives upended by violence. Rarely do we pause to consider the environmental devastation that wars cause. In the din of battle and the rush to treat and shelter its survivors, the toxic legacy of war is often ignored — as is the long-term damage to the health of millions of people forced to live amid the pollution.
There is nothing new in the waste generated by war. Parts of Belgium and France are still suffering from the contamination of heavy metals used in the weapons of the first world war. In Vietnam, the herbicide Agent Orange, sprayed to strip trees of foliage that gave the enemy cover, has caused birth defects, cancers, skin disorders and mental disability.
When bombs fall, the environment suffers. In Colombia, which hosts 10 percent of the planet’s biodiversity, half a century of war …more
As insect numbers plummet worldwide, inaction isn't an option
From time to time, insects make the news. For example, the bark beetle has snagged headlines as its range has increased due to warming temperatures, leading to the decimation of large tracks of North American forests. Other wild invertebrates, like the western bumblebee, have attracted attention due to a pronounced decline in numbers. However, what has now come to light is that insects as a whole biological class — and including the most commonplace species — have been disappearing. Buzzing bugs likes flies, wasps, moths, and butterflies, once taken for granted in their ubiquitousness, are vanishing.
Photo by Dan (catching up), Flickr
In October, the journal PLOS published a study finding a 76 percent decline in flying insect biomass in Germany’s natural areas over a 27-year period, from 1989 to 2016. Researchers from Radboud University, University of Sussex, and Entomological Society Krefeld measured the changes in total biomass by setting Malaise traps — tent-like structures used to trap insects — in 63 nature protection areas. Researchers found the pattern of decline to be similar across the different locations. The changes in biomass varied between the seasons, with an 82 percent decline in mid-summer, when insects numbers are usually at their highest.
Prior to conducting the study, the research team was aware of documented declines in abundance of single insect species, but posited total insect biomass as an indicator of overall ecological health. Ultimately, the results of their study far exceed the average estimated decline of vertebrate species globally — a 58 percent decline — reported by the World Wildlife Fund’s 2016 Living Planet Report, which tracked the change in abundance of many living organisms between 1970 and 2012. This report and others that make reference to the sixth mass extinction currently underway, in which the planet is losing species at an unusually high rate, often focus on the loss of vertebrate species. The PLOS study indicates that invertebrates could be facing even steeper losses.
“Loss of insect diversity and abundance is expected to provoke cascading effects on food webs and jeopardize ecosystem services,” wrote the study’s authors. “The widespread insect biomass decline is alarming, ever more so as all traps were placed in protected areas that are meant to preserve ecosystem functions and biodiversity.”
As insects are a crucial …more
New initiative highlights on-the-ground climate solutions that uplift women’s leadership
On Louisiana’s Gulf Coast, journalist, activist, and mother of six Cherri Foytlin is a tireless fighter for climate justice, taking on huge entities threatening the health and ecosystems of Gulf Coast communities. She leads the L’eau Est La Vie (Water is Life) Camp, a floating community hidden away within Louisiana’s wetlands that is challenging the Bayou Bridge pipeline, a project of Energy Transfer Partners, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline. A flotilla of handmade rafts, some laden with arresting Indigenous art structures, is home base for the next phase of the resistance inspired by Standing Rock.
Photo by Emily Arasim/Women's Earth & Climate Action Network
A world away, Marshallese Kathy Jetnil-Kijiner, has found that the spoken word is her most potent weapon in confronting existential climate change. The 29-year-old poet, writer, performance artist, and journalist wowed an audience of 120 heads of state at the opening of the UN General Assembly in 2014 with her impassioned delivery of “Dear Matafele Peinem,” a poem that pledged to her baby daughter that the Marshall Islands would not only survive the threats of climate change but go on to thrive.
Zimbabwean peasant farmer Elizabeth Mpofu is well tested by her nearly forty years working for the betterment of smallholder farmers and on behalf of women’s rights. Smallholder farming, she says, is the key to restoring the balance of the Earth and creating long-lasting resilience in the face of climate change impacts. Mpofu serves as general coordinator of the International Coordination Committee for La Via Campesina, an international peasants’ movement that includes more than 200 million global members. Zimbabwe’s fast-track land reform of the early 2000s made Mpofu a land owner and a believer in the political efficacy of direct action. She also believes in the power of women. “In most regions where Via Campesina is present,” she says, “the leaders are women. Women are actively involved in formulating our own policies. We are building the capacity of women within the organization from the ground up.”
Despite countless global studies that attest to women’s unique vulnerabilities and life-saving ingenuity in the face of climate change impacts, CNN and Media Matters have reported that only 15 percent of those interviewed in the media coverage of …more
America's largest meat producer must clean up its act and incentivize improvements in livestock feed production
What comes to mind when you think of Tyson Foods? A chicken nugget? A big red logo?
How about the largest toxic dead zone in US history? It turns out the meat industry — and corporate giants like Tyson Foods — are directly linked to this environmental catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, and many others.
Photo by NOAA’s National Ocean Service
Industrial-scale agriculture to support America's livestock is the number one source of water pollution in the country. But while industrial agriculture to feed animals raised for meat is currently resource-intensive and ecologically destructive, it doesn't have to be. Solutions exist which, if adopted, would allow the meat industry and agricultural corporations that sustain it to reduce their impact on water and the planet.
That's why Mighty Earth has launched the Clean It Up, Tyson campaign in order to hold this industry accountable to our communities and the environment. Corporations can and should respect the health and well-being of their customers, and the landscapes that allow them to profit. Considering America's current political climate, and the increasing severity of environmental problems across the globe, collective action and corporate-targeted campaigns like this one have never been more urgent.
In a country with five times as many livestock animals as humans, it takes a lot of land to grow feed for the meat that ends up on consumers' plates. Over a third of America's agricultural land is dedicated towards the production of corn and soy, but humans consume less than 10 percent of this, according to Mighty Earth's campaign report. The vast majority is consumed by livestock.
What many people don't realize is that this livestock feed production is controlled by a very small number of large and powerful corporations, making huge upstream profits, but creating massive downstream pollution. These companies — ADM, Bunge, Cargill (often referred to as the ABCs) — don't have much of a public reputation, as they don't sell directly to individual consumers. Under our current regulatory system, they're also not responsible for their run-off or excess fertilizer use, both of which are classified as "non-point source" pollution. In other words, soil erosion and run-off from enormous swaths of America's crop fields are washing into the …more