More than 18 months after federal investigation violated internal rules, activists say they were still watchlisted at the airport, visited at home by a terrorism task force and detained for hours because they ‘seemed like protesters’
This story was produced in partnership with the Guardian.
An activist was placed on a US government watchlist for domestic flights after being swept up in an FBI investigation into protests of the Keystone XL pipeline, linking a breach of intelligence protocol with accounts of continued tracking that environmentalists fear could follow them for life.
Photo courtesy of Bradley Stroot
Twenty-five-year-old Bradley Stroot is one of several campaigners to go public, after the Guardian and Earth Island Journal revealed an FBI investigation that labeled them “environmental extremists,” with new allegations of a continued crackdown. From an hours-long detention at the US border to a home visit by a terrorism task force and an encounter with police searching for bombs, the activists say law enforcement has tracked them from a peaceful Texas protest of the highly contentious oil project in 2012 and 2013 to the tony suburbs of Indianapolis as recently as the end of last year.
Stroot told the Guardian that when he flew back to Texas to visit a friend last December, he learned that he was on a watchlist — known as a “Secondary Security Screening Selection” — and was subjected to more invasive airport security measures.
The FBI’s investigation into anti-Keystone activists was closed in June 2014 due to a lack of credible intelligence regarding threats to the pipeline and extremist activity.
According to internal agency documents obtained by the Guardian and Earth Island Journal, it was discovered in August 2013 that the FBI’s investigation had been opened without proper approval from the chief legal counsel of the agency’s Houston division and a senior agent, resulting in a report of “substantial non-compliance” with rules set out by the US Justice Department.
But before the internal violations were discovered, information on Stroot and several other activists was included in FBI files. Now, interviews with Stroot, who was held up at Chicago’s O’Hare airport six months after the investigation was closed, and other protesters indicate that they are still being monitored by law enforcement.
Stroot and two other people involved in the protests were described in the files as having separate, larger “Subject” …more
As the smartphone industry turns its attention to emerging markets, energy poverty poses a challenge
With interest from Elon Musk to a16z’s Steven Sinofsky, momentum in Silicon Valley may be heading in an unlikely direction — towards addressing energy poverty.
Energy poverty, which affects 1.3 billion people around the world who lack access to electricity, is, according to David Roberts, “the greatest challenge of our time.” (Read his take in not one but two separate posts.) That’s because it pits our need to reduce fossil fuel consumption while lifting hundreds of millions out of extreme poverty head-to-head. It’s hardly the place where you’d expect investors who recently invested $1.5 million in the word "Yo" would focus their efforts.
photo Par Almqvist
But pressure has been building for Silicon Valley to move beyond “me-too” apps to tackle some of the world’s greatest problems. People like Vivek Wadhwa have excoriated the valley over its lack of investment in enormous entrenched challenges from poverty to climate change. Energy poverty sits squarely between the two, but, despite growing interest in a broad bucket category called "science," has thus far received little interest.
But that pressure to invest pales in comparison to a much bigger force potentially driving the valley towards energy poverty — the smartphone. Remember, a not so insignificant portion of today’s venture capital (VC) investment boom centers around the cellphone as a platform for driving sales revenue. But traditional markets are increasingly saturated, which has led mobile phone companies, and the industries that piggyback on their platform, to seek emerging or frontier markets.
That has caused a global boom in cellphone penetration that has leapfrogged landline telephones. More importantly, that push to frontier markets includes a push to the next frontier of ad revenue — smartphones that connect people to the Internet. That’s why organizations like Facebook have launched initiatives to connect billions of people to the Internet — with all manner of crazy technology including lasers and balloons. Because, without a Wi-Fi connection, all those unconnected devices are leaving value on the table.
But there’s actually one much bigger catch: you …more
‘The Fisherman’s Son’ on his fight to save Chile’s iconic Punta de Lobos
In a parking lot in Northern California, a white screen is hanging from the tin wall of a surf shop. A crowd has gathered for the screening of The Fisherman's Son, a film about professional big-wave surfer Ramon Navarro and his fight to save one of Chile's most iconic surf breaks, Punta de Lobos. We are all waiting for it to get darker so that the movie can begin; the projection must not compete with the light of the California sun. Meanwhile, everyone is having a good time. It’s Saturday and the crowd is alive. More than a few people appear to have come directly from the beach to see Navarro in person as he tours the West Coast screening his film and raising money to create a land trust at Punta de Lobos.
Photo by Government of Chile
Ramon Navarro is a fisherman’s son. He is also a fisherman's grandson and great-grandson. He is from Pichilemu, Chile and at the April film screening I attended, Navarro continuously asserted that the land and its people have given him everything. Director Chris Malloy captures the surfer's origin well. There is a scene in which Navarro's grandmother recounts a childhood memory of eating sea bass stuffed with apples and cooked under hot sand and coals. By the time Malloy turns his camera toward the threat of development and the campaign to save Punta de Lobos, the viewer knows and can almost taste what is at stake; the local food and access to its abundance, the stories people tell about the land, the culture.
In 2013, Punta de Lobos was approved as a world surfing reserve by Save the Waves, a conservation organization focused on exceptional surfing areas around the world. Save the Waves has helped protect areas with remarkable surf in Peru, Australia, Mexico, and Santa Cruz, California. The organization designates reserves based on a number of criteria, including the quality of the waves, the consistency of good waves throughout the year, biodiversity, and other ecological factors.
The organization also emphasizes the importance of community involvement when selecting new reserve locations. In Pichilemu, the local organization fighting to protect the coast is the Comité por la Defensa de Punta de …more
In fragmented habitats, nearly half of all species are lost within 20 years
The US National Park System includes more than 400 sites spread across some 84 million acres. But few national parks are large enough to contain ecosystems. Two new studies reveal that America’s national parks and other protected public lands are too small and fragmented to sufficiently preserve the nation’s biodiversity. Often missing are conservation corridors linking islanded protected areas.
A recent study on habitat fragmentation reached startling conclusions for the country’s ecosystems. Conducted by two-dozen leading ecologists, the study focused on long-term habitat fragmentation experiments on five continents. The authors found that more than 70 percent of the world’s forests are within one kilometer of a forest edge, making them susceptible to degradation by suburban, urban, and agricultural pressures that intrude further into forests every day. These influences were found to reduce diversity of life by 13 percent to 75 percent in all areas studied, with the percentage increasing the closer the habitat to the edge. In fragmented habitats, nearly half of all species are lost within 20 years, and this downward trend continues over time.
“Large public lands like national parks are critical for conservation, but not sufficient. Larger connected areas of land need to be conserved,” the study’s lead author, Nick M. Haddad of North Carolina State University, explained in an interview. “The scope and scale of land needed to protect and preserve a variety of biodiversity is well beyond the area that the national parks encompass. Ideally, it would be great to enlarge national parks, but more realistically the size needed to protect biodiversity should connect other protected areas in conjunction with national parks.”
Haddad cited the Yellowstone to Yukon corridor as an example. “The 1,800 miles of lands stringed together consist of several national parks and other protected lands, creating a superhighway for wildlife to flourish,” he said. “With human population increasing and the resources those increases call for, there is a greater need for more conservation against these pressures. We need to take advantage of the parks and other public lands, think outside their boundaries to create resilience and resist the negative changes of a shrinking …more
A controlled, legal trade is more likely to slow elephant poaching
This opinion essay offers another view on the question posed in our Plus-Minus debate, The Ivory Market: Keep It Closed or Open It Up?
What if we’re wrong about how best to save elephants from being killed for their ivory?
Photo by Dongyi Liu
By now, there’s little dispute that these magnificent creatures are running out of time. Poaching rates continue to exceed elephant population growth rates, making it essential for the international conservation community to find real-world solutions to the ongoing crisis.
I certainly share the growing revulsion over poaching. But I find it alarming that so much of what’s now being promoted as elephant advocacy is likely to accomplish little for elephants.
Instead of looking at what’s behind the seemingly insatiable demand for ivory, elephant supporters are pushing for the global prohibition of all trade in ivory.
Here’s the problem. Ivory is no passing fashion, as I’ve written about at length. It’s been valued since prehistoric times. Anti-ivory campaigners caricature its primary use as carving material for the production of “trinkets.” Yes, huge quantities of bric-a-brac have been made from ivory, as well as a vast amount of industrial uses — piano keys, billiard balls and the like.
But the dominant use of ivory has always been art, and now, millennia later, we are left with an astonishing array of culturally significant objects made from this organic treasure, objects that we cannot destroy unless we want to erase vast swaths of not just of art history, but human history. Suppressing trade in these legal objects does nothing to protect elephants.
It’s a fantasy to think that appreciation of, interest in, and thus demand for ivory will ever entirely disappear. That’s why the ivory prohibition schema being pushed by wildlife and animal rights groups threatens to become conservation's version of the War on Drugs — yet another costly crusade that, after immense suffering and loss of life, will reveal that a problematic trade item can only be managed, not eradicated.
There is nothing inherently wrong with ivory — it’s how ivory is often obtained from elephants that is so troubling.
But wait, you say. Behind every piece of ivory is …more
Announcement offers hope amid African poaching crisis and dwindling elephant numbers
Last week was a big one for African elephants. China, the world’s largest market for illegal ivory, announced that it would phase-out its legal, domestic ivory market. With elephants under dire threat from poaching, the news could not be more welcome to conservationists.
“Under the legal framework of CITES and domestic laws and regulations, we will strictly control ivory processing and trade until commercial processing and the sale of ivory and its products are eventually halted,” said Zhao Shucong, head of China’s State Forestry Administration, referencing the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Flora and Fauna. The announcement came at a public event in Beijing, where officials destroyed 662 kilograms of confiscated ivory, including elephant tusks and ivory carvings.
So far, no additional details have been announced about the phase-out.
“We will be eagerly waiting for [details and a timeline], because of course the details are very important,” said Andrew Wetzler, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council’s land and wildlife program, speaking by phone. “But it is a very encouraging step.”
African elephant numbers have plummeted in the past century, from an estimated 10 million in 1913, to roughly 1.3 million in 1979, to just around 500,000 today. Between 2010 and 2012 alone, poachers killed 100,000 African elephants. Conservationists warn that if poaching isn’t controlled, African elephants could soon disappear entirely. (Read more about the poaching crisis and organized crime here.)
Poaching has been driven by the high demand — and the corresponding high prices — of ivory, particularly in China. In an increasingly affluent China, this demand only seems to be growing. In fact, a National Geographic survey found that 84 percent of the Chinese middle class intend to buy ivory products in the future. Conservationists say that China’s flourishing legal ivory market provides a front for illegal black-market ivory, feeding the poaching crisis. As a result, China is seen as an essential participant in any successful effort to curb global ivory demand and tackle elephant poaching.
Friday’s announcement was the first time China has committed to closing …more
South Africa is struggling with too many animals and too little open land
In Central and East Africa, poachers are killing tens of thousands of elephants a year, threatening the very survival of the species. In South Africa, however, conservationists are facing a different problem. In many of the country's reserves rising elephant numbers pose such a threat to habitat and other species that radical solutions to population control — including vasectomies of wild bulls and chemical contraception of females — are being adopted.
Photo by Ann and Steve Toon
South Africa's estimated 17,000 elephants live in fenced reserves with negligible ivory poaching, few predators, and abundant water. Natural mortality rates are suppressed, birth rates are high, and numbers have grown at around 7 percent annually, a rate that left unchecked means local populations can double in size in less than a decade. Now, landscapes are beginning to show signs of strain due to this population growth.
Elephants are what biologists call “habitat engineers.” That is, they play a significant role in maintaining healthy, diverse ecosystems. But with a daily intake of 600 pounds of food and a habit of stripping bark from trees, pushing over large trees, and breaking branches to get at leaves, the beneficial effects of opening up dense bush can soon turn to habitat degradation when elephant numbers rise too far and too fast. Woodland is reduced to grassland, key tree species are lost (along with the unique ecosystems they support), and vulnerable species are out-competed for water.
Where once elephants would have roamed widely for food and water, spreading their impact (and their ecosystem benefits) widely, fences now prevent such migrations. The construction of artificial waterholes, intended to improve game viewing for tourists, has compounded the problem.
By Ann and Steve Toon
In truth, the relationship between elephant numbers and habitat is complex and poorly understood. Some scientists maintain that elephants’ ecosystem impacts have been exaggerated. Or it may be that the changes they are causing on South African landscapes is simply a return to past environmental conditions, when there were even more elephants. “Before …more